• barrbaric [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      With modern missile tech is there even any reason to put nuclear missiles in Taiwan? I was under the impression that ICBMs have basically made that pointless. Oh no, the targets will live for 5-10 whole minutes longer during the travel time.

          • REgon [they/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            I don’t think the US has capacity to make hypersonic missiles though, so that would require the arms manufacturers to actually do some research and improve manufaturing

            • barrbaric [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              2 months ago

              Hmm, you’re right, and that wouldn’t be very profitable. Perhaps they should see if they can buy the technology from China! i-love-not-thinking

      • Parzivus [any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 months ago

        It kinda matters in that there’s a chain of command before you can retaliate. Someone has to see the missiles, make sure it’s not a malfunction, tell their boss who tells their boss, etc. Ideally your missiles land before the counterattack starts. This is why deploying missiles in eastern Europe was such a big deal to Putin as well.