The measure received 14 votes in favour, with the US the sole member to reject it. However, because the US is a permanent member of the council, it has the ability to veto any resolution brought forward

Unlike several previous resolutions regarding a ceasefire in Gaza, Wednesday’s measure was brought forward by all 10 elected members of the Security Council.

The US has vetoed four previous attempts at calling for a ceasefire in Gaza, on most occasions being the lone vote against the measures.

    • NatakuNox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      92
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 month ago

      Shows he and the Democratic leaders never intended to end the genicide. Just another sign the democrats no longer support anyone but the oligarchy. Yes the Republicans are worse by alot but people that are anti genicide, anti oligarchy, anti fascism, anti authoritarianism, etc don’t have a party to vote for. Only the level of oppression they will see in the next 4 years.

        • Saleh@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          38
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          1 month ago

          As long as you keep voting limb cutters, they have no motivation to stop cutting limbs. Not voting for limb cutters is the only way to make non limb cutting get on the ballot

            • Saleh@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              23
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 month ago

              You do realize that there is more than one election? Like every four years there is an election. Treating every election like it is the only one and never looking past the immediate effects for the next year is what brought this mess in the first place.

              This is also why this comparison is bad. You can not only loose at this election, but the next one and the one after that amd the one after that. In fact one could argue Americans have been loosong every election to the neoliberals since a few decades. And why? Because you never made a point of getting one party to stop being neoliberals.

              • rknx@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                15
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 month ago

                This election made me realize that political affiliation in the states for a lot of people is like being in a cult. Rather than accepting that your side has issues and needs a change, people just try to justify it by pointing how bad the other side can be worse. Like 90% of lemmy democrats don’t get that I’m not motivated to vote for being waist-deep in shit vs chest-deep in shit. Yes, one is worse than another, but I prefer to vote so I don’t have to be in shit at all. But all they will say back is hurr durr trump bad.

                • Keeponstalin@lemmy.worldOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  10
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  I feel like we need to normalize that demanding more from representatives is OK and necessary for a functioning democracy. The party needs to respond to the demands of those they are supposed to represent. This election made it clear that they only care about the demands of the donors and that needs to change

                  • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 month ago

                    But given a fundamentally broken system such as FPTP, voting is going to do very little to fix the flaws. There is the winner and everyone else, and that everyone else may be the majority. So fi d a better tool for the job. This one clearly isn’t working.

                • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 month ago

                  Like 90% of lemmy democrats don’t get that I’m not motivated to vote for being waist-deep in shit vs chest-deep in shit. Yes, one is worse than another, but I prefer to vote so I don’t have to be in shit at all.

                  The reason people keep trying to say the same thing over and over is because your vote to “not be in shit at all” results in all of us being chest-deep. I want the Dems to change too but it isn’t going to happen as a result of folks withholding their votes while we’re in a two party system with FPTP voting. So since I would rather be knee deep than chest deep, I voted knee deep.

                  I’m not going to shame anyone for their voting choices, but let’s not try to deny - not voting results in chest deep shit, not no shit, and we’ll all get an object lesson in this every single day for about (at least) four years starting in January.

                  If you are going to proudly stand by your principled choice (which I support), at least be honest about the effects.

              • would_be_appreciated@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 month ago

                You have this perspective that “we can show them” if we just let the Republicans win, but there’s no evidence to support that. Every time the Republicans have won, the Democrats have moved to the right, not the left.

                If you want a third party to emerge, you can advocate for that, but a truly leftist third party isn’t possible if we lose all our limbs.

                • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 month ago

                  EVEN NOW they are blaming progressives, not her nonsensical attempt to woo Republicans while moving right so fast it left vapor trails behind her after announcing her candidacy.

                  I thought this was going to be a great article. The title made me think it was going to be all about getting tough with Republicans and actually fighting.

                  https://www.salon.com/2024/11/19/how-democrats-can-move-past-low-dominance-messaging/

                  SURELY, Salon of all places will rightly criticize her for deciding to run as a Republican. BUT NO:

                  Harris also failed to bear down on her hard-edged prosecutor-versus-felon narrative, which figured prominently during the early, effective stages of her campaign. Maybe she yielded to the far left, which admonished her for stigmatizing felons. That’s what she did in her bid for the Democratic nomination in 2019-2020, which helps explain why her first campaign folded before she could even get it off the ground.

                  YIELDED to the far left? With Cheneys on stage at the DNC, more talk about her glock than about climate, no movement on palestine, and not even a willingness to let a pro-Palestine speaker have 30 secs of podium time at the event?

                  In what fucking way did she “Yield” to the far left with a campaign very clearly and transparently designed to woo Republicans into voting Democrat?

                  M. Steven Fish is a professor of political science at the University of California, Berkeley.

                  I have to question your grip on reality, Professor Steven Fish of UC Berkeley, if you think what you saw in recent months was Kamala “yielding” a damn thing to the left.

            • njm1314@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              Not for nothing, but where is this two limb option? All I see is four limb options except one is grinning and clapping the other is just wearing a false look of commiseration.

        • NatakuNox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 month ago

          Me: why orphan crushing machine?

          You: because other orphan crushing machine driven by Nazies.

          Me: but why don’t we destroy orphan crushing machine?

          You: because orphan crushing machine go burrrrrrrrr

          Me:…

          • Strykker@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            1 month ago

            Come back when there is an option that actually destroys the orphan crushing machines. Otherwise your just pouring more fuel into it and making it work faster.

    • maplebar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      39
      ·
      1 month ago

      The right thing is to enact a ceasefire in exchange for the immediate release of all Isreali hostages.

      The US was right to veto this unenforceable, performative UN bullshit on the grounds that it didn’t call for the immediate release of the hostages.

      • acargitz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        It’s a fucking genocide. Stop the killing sort the hostages after.

        • maplebar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          23
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          sort the hostages after.

          “Sort” the hostages “after” what?

          So in your imagination Israel unilaterally stops fighting against Hamas while (a) Hamas continues to hold civilians hostage, doing all manners of physical and psychological torture to people who only happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time and (b) Hamas, Hezbollah, Iran and tribal gangs continue to wage attacks against Israel? And then (and only then), Israel comes back to the negotiating table with Hamas once again for yet another round of negotiations to try to free the hostages, only for Hamas to decide to move the goalposts?

          Is this really the type of illogical nonsense people here believe in?

          No wonder this shit has been going on for decades… Y’all have lost your damn minds if you think that the world works this way.

          • acargitz@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            24
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            Stop the genocide. Stop the killing of innocent civilians. Now.

            Then, reach a deal for the hostages, like the ones Netanyahu has repeatedly shot down.

            Then, end the occupation: get Israel the fuck out of Gaza, the fuck out of the West Bank, the fuck out of East Jerusalem, back to their 1967 borders.

            Or, if you don’t think this is realistic (and it isn’t because with almost a million settlers, the Israeli right has destroyed the material conditions required for the 2 state solution) prefer cleaner solutions, end Jewish supremacy in Greater Israel (Israel+West Bank+Gaza+Golan+Shebaa). One state, one democracy, equal rights for everyone.

            Persecute all war criminals, Israeli and Palestinian. Then run a truth and reconciliation process, with reparations.

            Justice, right? Crazy, I know. Illogical shit.

            Here’s the catch: without justice there will be no peace. Enjoy your endless cycle of violence.

            • maplebar@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              20
              ·
              1 month ago

              There is no “justice” in any circumstances in which the hostages are not immediately returned.

              Then, reach a deal for the hostages, like the ones Netanyahu has repeatedly shot down.

              So you’re literally just confirming this:

              So in your imagination Israel unilaterally stops fighting against Hamas while (a) Hamas continues to hold civilians hostage, doing all manners of physical and psychological torture to people who only happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time and (b) Hamas, Hezbollah, Iran and tribal gangs continue to wage attacks against Israel? And then (and only then), Israel comes back to the negotiating table with Hamas once again for yet another round of negotiations to try to free the hostages, only for Hamas to decide to move the goalposts?

              You must have read “Art of the Deal”.

                • maplebar@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  13
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  If you could argue against what I said you wouldn’t resort to putting words in my mouth, mate.

                  And if you could read you would know that both Israelies and Palestinians are the “local population” with somewhat dubious historic claims over the land spanning back >3000 years.

                  Need I remind you that it was the British that drew the maps that have lead us to where we are today?

              • acargitz@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                14
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                Explain why Israeli lives matter more than Palestinian lives. Like, be precise.

                • maplebar@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  11
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 month ago

                  Who said they are? Only you so far.

                  You should be more precise with your weird, non sequitur questions.

                  • acargitz@lemmy.ca
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    10
                    ·
                    1 month ago

                    You keep only talking about 97 Israelis when tens of thousands of Palestinians are dead and countless other are maimed, injured, starved, disposessed. You obviously value those 97 lives more than any of that. Explain why.

      • Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I hate to break it to you but any hostages are most likely dead. Probably killed by the IDF themselves. The people of Gaza are also starving to death. You think POW’s are getting first dibs? They won’t agree to release them because there aren’t any alive.

        I could be wrong but there’s my 2 cents.

        • maplebar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          22
          ·
          1 month ago

          Return the bodies then.

          Frankly I hope that they are dead, because the idea of living in a dungeon under Gaza being raped and tortured every day for 13 months is horrific.

          And if Hamas has lost track of even the hostages bodies then I don’t envy them, because it seems that they’ve lost what little bargaining position they once had. Uh oh for them.

      • AliSaket
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 month ago

        The second paragraph reads:

        The draft resolution was aimed at calling for an “immediate, unconditional, and permanent ceasefire” in Gaza and the release of all hostages held by Palestinian groups in the enclave.