“Because in 2024, Ukraine is no longer facing Russia. Soldiers from North Korea are standing in front of Ukraine. Let’s be honest. Already in Ukraine, the Iranian ‘Shahedis’ are killing civilians absolutely openly, without any shame,” said Zaluzhny, adding that North Korean and Chinese weapons are flying into Ukraine. Zaluzhny urged Ukraine’s allies to draw the right conclusions. “It is still possible to stop it here, on the territory of Ukraine. But for some reason our partners do not want to understand this. It is obvious that Ukraine already has too many enemies. Ukraine will survive with technology, but it is not clear whether it can win this battle alone,” he said.

  • WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    The Clinton administration demonstrated strong diplomatic capabilities in 1994.

    You mean when Clinton negotiated with Yeltsin (not super-relevant) to not target strategic missiles at one another (not verifiable, and reversible in moments)?

    Regarding recent geopolitical tensions, it raises important questions, such as why Russia is engaging in conflicts with smaller neighboring countries.

    To grab resources, restore the Russian empires old borders on line with long-standing doctrine, and to distract from domestic issues that would threaten Putin’s interests.

    There have been allegations over the years that Ukraine has siphoned gas or oil from these pipelines, contributing to longstanding disputes.

    Credible allegations? This isn’t super-hard to verify, and even if it were true, it’s no reason to annex Ukraine.

    I’ve considered multiple perspectives, and like a reasonable person, discarded the invalid ones rather than treating flagrantly dishonest propaganda and baseless speculation/fantasy as important considerations that need to be accommodated.

    • NastyNative
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      37 minutes ago

      Where we differ is in our perspectives. You come from a noble place, advocating for the restoration of Ukraine’s sovereignty and even the potential removal of Putin. While this outcome is ideal, it may not be realistic in the short term. Meanwhile, countless lives are being lost, and the suffering continues.

      The United States stands to benefit the longer this conflict persists, showing little interest in pursuing a path to peace. While it positions itself as Ukraine’s ally, it simultaneously sends Ukraine into a prolonged struggle against a vastly larger adversary.

      This war arguably began in 2008, when NATO promised eventual membership to Ukraine and Georgia but failed to follow through. Now, NATO appears to be watching from the sidelines as Ukraine fights on its behalf at the front lines."