sag@lemm.eeM to Cassette Futurism@lemm.ee · 1 day agoAny tech from 70s and 80s or resembles it (sometime early 90s is allowed) is Cassette Futurism.message-squaremessage-square14fedilinkarrow-up133arrow-down15file-text
arrow-up128arrow-down1message-squareAny tech from 70s and 80s or resembles it (sometime early 90s is allowed) is Cassette Futurism.sag@lemm.eeM to Cassette Futurism@lemm.ee · 1 day agomessage-square14fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareacockworkorangelinkfedilinkarrow-up7·edit-220 hours agoI’d love to see your sources on that. Because all the definitions I’ve seen go further. The shortest one relies on examples: https://cari.institute/aesthetics/cassette-futurism The venerable and verborrhagic TVTropes: https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/CassetteFuturism A fandom wiki: https://aesthetics.fandom.com/wiki/Cassette_Futurism By your definition, Ferris Bueler’s day off is a cassette futurism movie. I don’t think even you agree with that.
minus-squaresag@lemm.eeOPMlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·edit-219 hours agor/CassetteFuturism allow Commodore or any other 70s or 80s tech. Even Fandom wiki shows NES and Gameboy.
minus-squaresag@lemm.eeOPMlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·edit-212 hours agoMovie? I don’t think so. It look normal does it have any Sci-Fi or Techy scene?
minus-squareacockworkorangelinkfedilinkarrow-up3·11 hours agoIt fits your definition. So where do you draw the line?
minus-squaresag@lemm.eeOPMlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·7 hours agoI mean I didn’t saw that movie? Does it have any techy things? Like computer related or anything like that.
minus-squareacockworkorangelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·7 hours agoForget the movie. Where do you draw the line?
minus-squaresag@lemm.eeOPMlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·7 hours agoI mean I judge it. If any computer which run Windows is not Casssette Futurism like IBM I guess?
minus-squareacockworkorangelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·7 hours agoWhy Windows? Which versions of Windows? What about non computers? You’re evading the question, which is: you admit your definition is insufficient, so how do you update it?
I’d love to see your sources on that. Because all the definitions I’ve seen go further.
The shortest one relies on examples: https://cari.institute/aesthetics/cassette-futurism
The venerable and verborrhagic TVTropes: https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/CassetteFuturism
A fandom wiki: https://aesthetics.fandom.com/wiki/Cassette_Futurism
By your definition, Ferris Bueler’s day off is a cassette futurism movie. I don’t think even you agree with that.
r/CassetteFuturism allow Commodore or any other 70s or 80s tech. Even Fandom wiki shows NES and Gameboy.
So Ferris Bueler is in?
Movie? I don’t think so. It look normal does it have any Sci-Fi or Techy scene?
It fits your definition. So where do you draw the line?
I mean I didn’t saw that movie? Does it have any techy things? Like computer related or anything like that.
Forget the movie. Where do you draw the line?
I mean I judge it. If any computer which run Windows is not Casssette Futurism like IBM I guess?
Why Windows? Which versions of Windows? What about non computers? You’re evading the question, which is: you admit your definition is insufficient, so how do you update it?