Illustration of overlapping browser windows with Ecosia’s logo, a tree graphic, Firefox’s logo, and the text “Together for a better web,” alongside a search bar with a green cursor.

Your tech choices matter more than ever. That’s why at Mozilla, we believe in empowering users to make informed decisions that align with their values. In that spirit, we’re excited to announce our partnership with Ecosia, a search engine that prioritizes sustainability, and social impact.

Did you know you could choose the search engine of your choice right from your Firefox URL bar? Whether you prioritize privacy, climate protection, or simply want a search experience tailored to your preferences, we’ve got you covered.

Ecosia goes beyond data protection by addressing environmental concerns. Every search made through the search engine contributes to tree-planting projects worldwide, helping to combat deforestation and regenerate the planet. Ecosia planted over 215 million trees, across the planet biodiversity hotspots, making a tangible difference in the fight against climate change. Just like Mozilla, they are committed to creating a better internet, and world, for everyone.

Together, Mozilla, Firefox and Ecosia are contributing to a web that is more open and inclusive, but above all — one where you can make an informed choice about what tech you use and why. Your tech choices make a difference.

As Firefox and Mozilla continue to champion user empowerment and innovation, we invite you to join us in shaping a web that makes the world better. Together, let’s make a positive impact — one search at a time.

  • Luna@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    18 hours ago

    So… what does this partnership actually mean? Will Ecosia be the default search engine once the deal with Google ends?

  • harsh3466@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    1 day ago

    Mozilla is on a great tear. Layoffs, pointless rebrand, and now a shit privacy greenwashing search engine partnership. I’m so excited for the future of Firefox.

  • LWD@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Whether you prioritize privacy*, climate protection, or simply want a search experience tailored to your preferences, we’ve got you covered.

    Ecosia goes beyond data protection by addressing environmental concerns…

    Together, Mozilla, Firefox and Ecosia are contributing to a web that is more open and inclusive, but above all — one where you can make an informed choice about what tech you use and why. Your tech choices make a difference.

    Someone should tell Mozilla about the AI-sized environmental concern in their browser?

    * ETA: Ecosia doesn’t mention privacy as a feature anywhere on its homepage. (I’m not counting the link to its unimpressive privacy policy.) They call themselves “Google, but greener”, and I believe them.

    • hangonasecond@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      20 hours ago

      In that sentence, they’re not referring to Ecosia specifically. Rather, they’re implying that you can choose a search engine which aligns to that value. A little weird to include it with no examples, in a post specifically about Ecosia, but I believe that’s the intent.

      • LWD@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        To wit, the very next sentence sure does seem to say that Ecosia is private.

        Ecosia goes beyond data protection by addressing environmental concerns.

    • OneMeaningManyNames@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Someone should tell Mozilla about the AI-sized environmental concern in their browser?

      It’s called offset /s

    • pyre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      oh no, don’t take away Google results that fill the entire screen with ads and irrelevant bullshit that relies my stolen data before my actual search terms!

      • Atemu@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Ecosia being any better in this regard would be news to me. They also rely on ads for funding.

      • Atemu@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Oh they’ve been getting worse for sure but Bing is still worse. I’ve used the Bing index via DuckDuckGo for years and it’s quite bad.

        I now use Kagi which uses both Google and Bing indices (among others) and it’s much better and I think most of that is because the Google index is used.

  • DrDystopia@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    1 day ago

    Ecosia, the “green” search engine with AI chat. Perfect match for Firefox, the browser ever more integrated with AI technology.

    I’ve just given up on Mozilla, using Cromite after a decade of Firefox/Fennec on desktop and mobile had been such an upgrade.

    • Id still trust/prefer a firefox based browser than something chromium based. Their are a lot of good firefox forks out their and it helps make googles stranglehold of web standards slower. I wish u luck one manifest v2 gets killed (ik its still supported for some forks of chromium but how long is that gonna last?)

      • DrDystopia@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        What do you mean by trusting? I trust Mozilla to increase the executives wages at the cost of everybody in the organisation. I trust that they’ll incorporate more and more features I find unwanted. Privacy-wise I haven’t trusted Mozilla since telemetry was opt-out. Security wise I haven’t trusted any browser for decades.

        Each to their own, I hope you’re happy with your setup.

        • JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          1 day ago

          Unfortunately it’s more complex than that, because of the issue of the rendering engine. If Firefox-based browsers disappear, the W3C (which controls web standards, including questions of privacy) will be de-facto controlled by a cabal of corporations. The last voice that cares even slightly about our privacy will be gone.

          Opt-out telemetry is bad, overpaid executives is bad. The alternative is worse.

          • OneMeaningManyNames@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            21 hours ago

            With no intention of stirring the pot, this sounds just like the pre-election arguments in favor of Democrats.

            The last voice that cares even slightly about our privacy will be gone.

            The emphasis here should be on “even slightly” rather than the dramatic effect of “the last voice”.

            I mean, if this slice approaches zero, then why it is better to stay with Firefox rather than moving on to more radical solutions?

            • JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              20 hours ago

              Indeed, this is just the pragmatism-vs-idealism debate.

              I am a pragmatist, you are an idealist. In my view, by asking for everything you are more likely to get nothing. It’s not worth it. It’s irresponsible.

              this sounds just like the pre-election arguments in favor of Democrats.

              Yes, and excellent arguments they were. What a different world we might live in today if just a handful of idealists had decided to suck it up and vote for the Democrat instead of the third-party purist who made their heart sing.

              if this slice approaches zero, then why it is better to stay with Firefox rather than moving on to more radical solutions?

              Because history shows that “radical solutions” are almost always a mirage. We already have an excellent browser made by a flawed but generally admirable company. If there are problems, the solution is to fix them, not to burn it all down.

          • DrDystopia@lemy.lol
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            No, my solution is ditching the entire overbloated web standards we have today and go the small web route where idealists can make useable software without being a giant organisation, targeted both by commercial and state interests.

            But that’s not going to happen any more than Mozilla will go back to being a decent org.

              • DrDystopia@lemy.lol
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                23 hours ago

                I’ve used both Mull and Iceraven on phone, Librewolf on desktop. I went back to stock FF and tweaked it on desktop because it was tuned differently than I wanted - Particularly when it came to dark mode support. On phone I always settled for Iceraven but it’s miles behind chromium forks when it comes to tab management (ironically, FF is miles ahead when it comes to tab management on desktop).

    • 𝘋𝘪𝘳𝘬@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      1 day ago

      Even the worst default browser on the worst cheap China phone from the worst grey market is an upgrade to mobile Firefox. This is just a dumpster fire since release and Mozilla never cared about it even one single bit. You cannot even set a homepage in this junkware excuse for a browser.

    • BlackEco@lemmy.blackeco.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Mozilla will probably lose (part of or all of, it’s not clear yet) Google’s funding following their monopoly case, so it’s probably best for them to look for other revenue sources.

      • 𝘋𝘪𝘳𝘬@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        They could also stop all this nonsense crap projects they sink money in without any real benefit, and focus mainly on the browser. This would give the browser likely 500% more funding than it has right now.

        Have one product, but make it a perfect product.

      • UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Oh, that’s bad. Ecosia won’t even give them a fraction of the revenue google does… I’ve no idea how they’re going to continue going on…

  • zante@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’ve been using ecosia for a few months now after ditching duck duck go after long long time .

    It’s shit.

    I tend to use GPT when I want to find anything.