• hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Wow. By the way, it got merged in the end and they said “rest assured, humans are my #1 priority”…

    • Mikina@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 hours ago

      This is my favorite sentence from his replies.

      I’ve learned today that you are sensitive to ensuring human readability over any concerns in regard to AI consumption

      • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 hours ago

        I mean this comes from Microsoft… I’m one of the Linux nerds here, so my perspective might be skewed 🙃 But I get that feeling a lot when interacting with Microsoft products. Like finding useful log data to debug an issue. It’s either not there in the first place, or completely incomprehensible and doesn’t even tell you a cause or where to look. Even after googling. I don’t think any of that is made for humans 😅

  • ignirtoq@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    21 hours ago

    I thought they would give some meaningless response and people prodding them for a real reason would get the truth out eventually. But no, they just come out and say it in their first response:

    Thanks for the contribution here and appreciate your attention to detail. We have decided to keep as-is… part of that decision is that more and more folks are using AI chat to access guidance and tables don’t always translate well in that context.

    • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      23 hours ago

      I think that’s referring to Microsoft Copilot. I’ve heard some people use it. General narrative is: machines will replace humans anyway, same for programmers. And since Microsoft sells these AI services, they’ll surely tell the story this way.