m_f@midwest.socialM to Fun Loops ▶️@midwest.socialEnglish · 1 month ago[R] Stupidest ways people have solved coding interviewsloops.videoexternal-linkmessage-square35fedilinkarrow-up182arrow-down15
arrow-up177arrow-down1external-link[R] Stupidest ways people have solved coding interviewsloops.videom_f@midwest.socialM to Fun Loops ▶️@midwest.socialEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square35fedilink
minus-squareScreamingFirehawk@feddit.uklinkfedilinkarrow-up15·1 month agoIt doesn’t, the array is still in the same order it started in, it’s members are just printed to the console in numerical order. It just prints the number 1 after 1 ms, 2 after 2 ms, 3 after 3 ms etc.
minus-squareRandelung@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7·1 month agoInstead of print you could add them to a second array, though. Even clear the original first for “in place” sorting; never mind the memory allocation for the lambdas.
It doesn’t, the array is still in the same order it started in, it’s members are just printed to the console in numerical order.
It just prints the number 1 after 1 ms, 2 after 2 ms, 3 after 3 ms etc.
Instead of print you could add them to a second array, though. Even clear the original first for “in place” sorting; never mind the memory allocation for the lambdas.