I have been thinking a lot since the election about what could explain the incredibly high numbers of Americans who seem incapable of critical thinking, or really any kind of high level rational thought or analysis.

Then I stumbled on this post https://old.reddit.com/r/guns/comments/16ires5/lead_exposure_from_shooting_is_a_much_more/

Which essentially explains that “Shooting lead bullets at firing ranges results in elevated BLLs at concentrations that are associated with a variety of adverse health outcome"

I looked at the pubmed abstract in that Reddit post and also this one https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5289032/

Which states, among other things, “Workers exposed to lead often show impaired performance on neurobehavioral test involving attention, processing, speed, visuospatial abilities, working memory and motor function. It has also been suggested that lead can adversely affect general intellectual performance.”

Now, given that there are well in excess of 300 million guns in the United States, is it possible lead exposure at least partially explains how brain dead many Americans seem to be?

This is a genuine question not a troll and id love to read some evidence to the contrary if any is available

  • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Was the majority of the German voting public lead-poisoned in the 30s? I don’t think lead was even put in gas then. Those Germans almost certainly were not lead poisoned, and they put a monster into power.

    I get wanting a good explanation, but in reality, it’s a simple but unsatisfying explanation. It applies to every country and every population in every era. People are fuckin’ stupid. Carlin said it best:

    “Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.”

    • SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      22 hours ago

      The German population went through serious economic troubles. Wheelbarrows of cash to buy stuff. Economically troubled people get angry and revolt, and in democratic systems that means firstly voting for the extreme candidates, the ones with a good story. Anger shuts down critical thinking and they don’t think about other consequences of their vote.

      That’s how many elections went in a lot of counties in the last few years too.

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Yeah, I get that saying people are fuckin stupid is dismissive and over simplified in a lot of cases… But it’s also still true and a factor, which adds to all the other factors you’re talking about. Ultimately I think if people were more educated and intelligent, they could overcome a lot of irrationality.

        • subignition@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          21 hours ago

          It’s deliberate. The right wing has been gradually whittling down the quality of our education system for more than a generation.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Right, but that’s where the analogy breaks down “wheelbarrows of cash”. You can try to reference that situation, you can try to talk about desperate people just wanting to lash out but no one is pushing around “wheelbarrows of cash”. Whatever desperate situation people think they are in pales before the reality. The huge difference in severity means they are hardly comparable at all. By pretty much any stat, we should be doing ok: there have been many times we’ve had it worse, so why is this the moment?

        This is where the last couple decades of hatred and divisiveness come in. Politicians bringing forth blame, scapegoats, stoking outrage at our problems. The hatred is always there. The violence is always there. Were conditions to a constant state of anger so that’s where too many turn for even a minor downturn

    • zqps@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      I dislike this saying because it’s always been assumed, never proven, that intelligence follows a normal distribution. That is if it can even be mapped to a single, consistent, comparable number.

      But your point is valid. Though I’d add that it’s not universally true. Fascists thrive on fear and ignorance. Give people access to a good education, which includes political education, and they are far more resilient to these tactics.

      Which is why it’s especially nefarious that conservatives love to undermine, vilify, and defund education.

      • JackbyDev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        17 hours ago

        I dislike this saying because it’s always been assumed, never proven, that intelligence follows a normal distribution.

        Okay, think of the median instead lol

      • MutilationWave@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Uneducated people are easier to control. Uneducated people are more likely to join the military or police. It’s that simple. And if you haven’t heard, Trump’s handlers are going to try to abolish the Department of Education.

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Interesting. Though I can’t say when Germany added it. I believe the 20s was when America started doing it, but according to a podcast I listened to recently, America was the first to start doing it. And also the effects of lead poisoning take decades to manifest.