If Honda and Nissan can’t survive at their size, well Subaru and Mazda are tiny by comparison.

  • Rajtinka@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    21 hours ago

    I thought the point was to combine so that they could compete with Chinese EV’s? To better move forward with hybrid and EV vehicles as the world transitions away from ICEs? I think it’s crazy that even combined they still sell a fraction of what Toyota sells and still only puts them at #3 behind VW. I only recently learned it’s so lopsided.

    • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Huh.

      Toyota Motors bought a little over 40% of GM’s former FHI stock, amounting to 8.7% of FHI. (The rest of GM’s shares went to a Fuji stock buy-back program.)[17]

      FHI being Fuji Heavy Industry, which is now Subaru Corporation.

      *Subaru Corporation:

      Owners

      Toyota (20.42%)

      The Master Trust Bank of Japan investment trusts (14.15%)

      Custody Bank of Japan investment trusts (5.28%)

      State Street Bank West Client - Treaty 505234 (1.56%)

      (as of September 30, 2024)[3]

      • NegativeLookBehind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        Nissan made some absolutely terrible design decisions, namely the wide use of CVTs. I think this has contributed to their downfall. I imagine Subaru and Mazda will be OK.

        • Nougat@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 days ago

          To be fair, Nissan CVTs end up being garbage because their fluid change interval is like 100K miles when it should be 30K miles. Change that fluid on the regular, and it’ll be fine.

        • Mac
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          Subaru uses CVTs as well.

          • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            2 days ago

            The problem is people see Nissans CVTs being shit and just assume all CVTs are shit. Really Nissan just chooses to make shit CVTs and their brand suffers because of it.

            Subaru puts CVTs in their cars and they’re largely fine. They naturally had some teething issues initially but coincidentally that was with the torque converter side of things and not the CV side.

            • czardestructo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              23 hours ago

              60k miles on my Subaru CVT and I beat the absolute shit out of it. I’ve towed at least 10 cords of wood with it and regularly pull a 12’ enclosured trailer with it. I’m constantly pushing its limits and thus far its managed fine.

  • ramble81@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    It’s not that they can’t survive because of their size, it’s that they can’t survive with the crappy products they’ve been putting out lately and their costs. From what I’ve seen Subaru still has a decent profit margin, so it doesn’t matter that they’re smaller.