The role-playing game replaced “race” with “species” and divorced several character traits from biological identity. Some longtime players are upset (as is Elon Musk).
They either needed to replace “race” with “species” or divorce traits from racial identity.
Instead they did both and I’m not sure it works? If a human is a different species from an elf, why shouldn’t elves be inherently better at magic? If they’re basically the same in terms of biological traits, what even makes them different species?
“Races” are now “species.” Some character traits have been divorced from biological identity; a mountain dwarf is no longer inherently brawny and durable, a high elf no longer intelligent and dexterous by definition.
…
“People really wanted to be able to mix and match their species choice with their character-class choice,” Crawford said, adding, “They didn’t want choosing a dwarf to make them a lesser wizard.”
It sounds like the goal was to decrease the differences between the species. Looking at the pages you posted, it sure doesn’t seem like elves are actually any better at magic. They get a few spells from their heritage, more proficiencies, but a human spell caster and an elven spell caster would basically be the same. It looks like the changes are intended to make playstyles interchangeable between the different species - no species is a greater or lesser wizard than any other species.
I guess I don’t dislike it? It just seems odd to make species less different.
They didn’t just “come across” as racist. Racial traits were racist in previous editions, by definition, because it was about the differences between races. Tying differences to race is always racist, that’s literally what racism is. I like the change to “species.”
But if they’re different species, I don’t really think those differences are racist anymore? I don’t really see how “elves have more magic than mountain dwarves” is still racist when they’re entirely different species. I guess it can be problematic for there to be one species that specializes in Int, Wis, and Cha since they’d just be inherently smarter and more beautiful? There’s probably no way to make that work. But why shouldn’t the elvish species be greater spellcasters? It’s just an odd choice.
They either needed to replace “race” with “species” or divorce traits from racial identity.
Instead they did both and I’m not sure it works? If a human is a different species from an elf, why shouldn’t elves be inherently better at magic? If they’re basically the same in terms of biological traits, what even makes them different species?
Elves do get extra bonuses in Magic beyond stats.
The article is unclear, because:
It sounds like the goal was to decrease the differences between the species. Looking at the pages you posted, it sure doesn’t seem like elves are actually any better at magic. They get a few spells from their heritage, more proficiencies, but a human spell caster and an elven spell caster would basically be the same. It looks like the changes are intended to make playstyles interchangeable between the different species - no species is a greater or lesser wizard than any other species.
I guess I don’t dislike it? It just seems odd to make species less different.
It’s not that all traits have been separated from species. Just the traits that come across as racist.
They didn’t just “come across” as racist. Racial traits were racist in previous editions, by definition, because it was about the differences between races. Tying differences to race is always racist, that’s literally what racism is. I like the change to “species.”
But if they’re different species, I don’t really think those differences are racist anymore? I don’t really see how “elves have more magic than mountain dwarves” is still racist when they’re entirely different species. I guess it can be problematic for there to be one species that specializes in Int, Wis, and Cha since they’d just be inherently smarter and more beautiful? There’s probably no way to make that work. But why shouldn’t the elvish species be greater spellcasters? It’s just an odd choice.