• TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      15 hours ago

      You know, even with the super advanced tech of Star Trek, I still think I’d want a bit more between me and death than an energy barrier. I don’t trust technology. I like redundancy.

      I get the same feeling when I see SpaceX’s Starship do the “flip and burn” landing maneuver.

      • samus12345@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        11 hours ago

        It’s like only using a force field for the brig instead of bars AND a force field. Dumb.

      • Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        The redundancy is the door.

        But yeah, they must have tremendous amounts of faith of the heart to have the control console for that way out in the open instead of a separate control room.

        • turmacar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          13 hours ago

          I mean it’s all digital crystals and voice overrides right? Could have one console up close on the floor and a more secure one back in the corner and control from the bridge.

          Best case the energy barrier is also the main thing keeping the doors open so when it fails that’s what triggers them to slam closed.

      • marcos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Isn’t the enterprise entirely held by those energy fields?

        It gets new holes all the time anyway.

        • elephantium@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Pretty much. A real structure would squish like a partially deflated balloon under the kinds of accelerations we see on Star Trek.

        • OpenStars@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Yes and no I would guess. Yes at a lower energy level like stasis / inertia / structure integrity buffers, plus the really super duper ones can deploy at a moment’s notice in case of an emergency, though it would be more efficient to not have those particular ones on 100% of the time.