Summary

Bryan Johnson, a 46-year-old tech multimillionaire focused on anti-aging, stopped using rapamycin—a supplement he took for five years—after research suggested it might accelerate aging.

Johnson cited side effects like skin infections and glucose issues, as well as findings from a recent study showing rapamycin could worsen epigenetic aging.

Known for extreme anti-aging experiments, Johnson also created the health startup Blueprint, which markets pricey supplements.

His controversial methods, including teenage blood transfusions and genital shock treatments, have raised skepticism about their effectiveness and safety.

  • livjq@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    1 个月前

    But he’s involving so many variables, is his data even useful? I don’t understand how you could extrapolate anything from a guy who takes so many supplements that may cause conflicting outcomes.

    • PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 个月前

      Someone who has a background in science would know that testing on a single person is not very useful for what other posters are wishing for (new proteins, new anti aging treatments).

      This billionaire has age dysmorphia and is using his wealth to experiment around. It’s unfortunate really.

      • Sludgehammer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 个月前

        It’s unfortunate really.

        I don’t know about “unfortunate”. His “move fast and break things” approach to anti-aging treatments have a good chance of killing him, and having one less dipshit billionaire who thinks he’s brilliant because he’s rich would undoubtedly benefit society as a whole.

      • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 个月前

        It’s unethical to experiment on anyone other than yourself, but there’s a reason we can cure so many things in mice, and it isn’t just that they’re a bit simpler. It’s also because they go through a lot of mice.

    • Serinus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 个月前

      Yes, because anything that looks promising can be pulled out as a hypothesis to be tested properly.