Unnecessary and deeply concerning bow to the new “king”

  • egerlach@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 hour ago

    The official @protonprivacy@mastodon.social account replied and doubled down

    protonprivacy@mastodon.social - @jonah

    Corporate capture of Dems is real. In 2022, we campaigned extensively in the US for anti-trust legislation.

    Two bills were ready, with bipartisan support. Chuck Schumer (who coincidently has two daughters working as big tech lobbyists) refused to bring the bills for a vote.

    At a 2024 event covering antitrust remedies, out of all the invited senators, just a single one showed up - JD Vance.

    1/2

    protonprivacy@mastodon.social - @jonah By working on the front lines of many policy issues, we have seen the shift between Dems and Republicans over the past decade first hand.

    Dems had a choice between the progressive wing (Bernie Sanders, etc), versus corporate Dems, but in the end money won and constituents lost.

    Until corporate Dems are thrown out, the reality is that Republicans remain more likely to tackle Big Tech abuses.

    2/2

    (Less importantly, my response)

    • dance_ninja@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      26 minutes ago

      So sounds like their main concern is addressing the abuses of the FAANG monopolies, and only a Republican has talked to them about it.

      I guess that is understandable in that very narrow lens, but it’s a bit laughable considering how all the big tech companies are also cozying up to the Trump administration. All this has done for me is make me wary of anything Proton does now.

    • egerlach@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 hour ago

      N.B. I originally went looking for a reason that maybe it was okay that Andy Yen was giving the thumbs up to Gail Slater. I thought this was an unfair internet pile-on. I think now it’s a fair internet pile-on.

    • ShotDonkey@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      16 minutes ago

      Fuck, they are dumb and bad businessmen. What’s the reason still to chose their product over Tuta, Posteo, Mullvad? They have lost their unique selling point as at least pretending being a neutral instance providing private services. Plain stupidity.

  • Razzazzika@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    41 minutes ago

    Why does he think Trump is against big tech when he’s working side by side with Musk?

  • Ulrich@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    38 minutes ago

    Yes I’m sure he’ll crack down hard on all the tech companies that are giving him millions of dollars and kissing his feet…

    What a moron.

  • Ballissle@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Ffs. I just switched a ton of stuff over to proton. Hopefully this is an individuals view and not that of the company as a whole.

  • tomatol@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Very disappointing that this is the CEO and founder of Proton. I’ll be moving my stuff elsewhere and deleting my account this week.

  • WhatSay@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Taking the time to remove Google, embraced proton mail … Maybe it’s time to just write letters and send meme post cards.

  • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    Biden’s pick Lina Khan deserves all the credit for aggressively prosecuting anti-competitive practices. However, Gina Slater looks like someone capable of continuing that work and a legitimate admirer of Lina Khan. Yes there are ties to Vance and the FTC office is likely to end up beholden to the egomaniac in chief. So the whole “little man” thing aside (that’s baloney), that’s one person that’s not a shit stain out of all the shit stains in the incoming cabinet.

    Look Lemmy, you’re welcome to choose what you want in your life and what you don’t. But being too rigid with letting stupid opinions of a project’s founder cause you to reject everything, would have you miss the big-picture benefits of having such a project exist. If you look at this Lemmy development co-leader’s opinions on transgenderism, are you going to stop using this software that lets you converse on an LGBTQ+ safe-space instance with no involvement on a social level from said developer/founder?

    • morrowind@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      13 minutes ago

      The lemmy devs may have opinions, but they’ve never interfered with blahaj zone or anything

    • eldavi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      19 minutes ago

      A CEO or any kind of leader gets to determine the path that their organization takes. Slater may seem good now; but we won’t know until the proof shows up in the pudding, so you can only try to guess based on whom she take orders from. (Fwiw: I hope you’re right)

      Bourgeoisie liberals do indeed use the transgendered in the same way that they used gays back in the 1990’s, as little more than a virtue signal and now (just like back then) they retreat from that virtue signal when it no longer suites their purposes.

      Unlike the Democrats & other liberals; there is plenty proof in Lemmy’s pudding of its creators’ intentions. The generations long reconciliations that LGBTQIA people had to struggle & die to force acceptance in the western world; despite the Democrats; is now falsely appropriated to pink wash anyone/anything who disagrees like it is here.

  • this@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 hours ago

    God. Fucking. Dam. It.

    I use too many of their services right now to get everything switched over to something else before trump takes power.

    The swiss better fucking jail this guy if he hands over data to the us government without swiss court approval, per swiss law.

    Now I have to find a new password manager, VPN, and email provider. Open to suggestions, but I want to find services that aren’t hosed in the us or by trump friendly countries/companies, and ideally use open source software and zero access encryption.

    • AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      15 minutes ago

      It might not have all the convenience of Proton Pass, but Keepass has been and probably always will be dependable.

      • this@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Yea I previously used bitwarden, my issue with it is that bitwarden is hosted in the US(which was the only reason I switched to PP), so I’m thinking about renting a vps and hosting vaultwarden in it or something.

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    101
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    Standing up for the little guy. Huh. Is that why billionaires and CEO are throwing literal tens of millions at Trump? Why he staffed his cabinet with billionaires? Why the center of his policy is tax cuts for the giga wealthy, at the expense of everyone else and the national debt, at a time where wealth inequality is literally tearing the country apart?

    https://www.axios.com/2025/01/15/trump-windfall-fundraising-500-million

    https://www.axios.com/2024/12/09/trump-wealth-cabinet-politicians-billionaires

    These are objective, public facts. Like, I’m way more conservative than Lemmy’s center and willing acknowledge any good Trump does, but what reality is this guy living in? Who is this statement for? Who the heck does he think is using Proton services? He just pissed off his employees and customers for… What?

    • UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Probably doesn’t want to get banned in the US… Or so my copium tells me.

      Silver lining is that Proton is owned by a non-profit.

      • fishos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I was thinking this for a second, but is this really plausible? Normally when we talk about corporations we talk about how powerful they are and how they use different nations to locate headquarters and offices in order to mitigate legal and tax obligations. We regularly talk about how governments can’t reign them in and how they act with impunity.

        But now? “They HAVE to capitulate. They are just doing it to survive.” Really? Do we really believe that? Or is it more likely that this is what they want and if they didn’t, they’d be fighting tooth and nail to stop it? I’m with the second option honestly.

    • Unquote0270@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Seems a lot of people share this view that somehow he’s for the little guy, despite quite clearly being for the opposite. It’s the same over the pond, there’s a paranoia held by many that the government is out to persecute the common people. Very strange on both sides, it’s almost Orwell levels of Newspeak.

  • jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Is this the same as, “fuck standards, pay for a walled garden, and promote crypto-scams” proton? I’m shocked 😮