I haven’t played any Baldur’s Gate games before but I’ve heard so much about this game that I’m going to buy it.

However, before I start, I always wonder about this: some games allow you to unlock any weapon at some point in the game, and if you miss one in some quest you can always go back. If you accidentally sell one you can buy it back or forge a new one again, or have it respawn. If you want some other class you can switch later.

Other games are not like that, and if you screw up or aren’t aware of [full in the blank] then you can’t unlock something.

What’s the story with BG3? Do I need to be careful and plan before going on missions?

    • Strae@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      It forces replayability if you’re the kind of person who needs to do everything.

      It’s absolutely enjoyable. The choices feel like they have a lot of weight. At the end of the day it’s just a video game, so you just have to pick a choice and see what happens. You can also save scum if you’re super unhappy with an outcome, but I try to avoid that.

    • kittenspronkles@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve always had a problem with these type of games where I don’t want to miss story content because I highly doubt I’ll play it again.

      However I really had to let it go on this game and just go along with it. Now I’m in Act 3 and I’m drowning in gear. I could also buy gear to do a variety of builds if I wanted.

      But don’t let perfect be the enemy of good. Just play the game and do what you want.

    • TrousersMcPants@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It makes the game feel more dynamic and helps make your experience with it feel more unique. I don’t view it as “missing content” as much as it is possible content I could experience

      • kadu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        That’s true for about 90% of the decisions.

        But there are some consequences that are unpredictable and objectively bad - one bad luck streak or bad decision can make your save a significantly lesser experience. As unpopular as this opinion is, I call this an actual design flaw with the game. There are however many decisions with positive or negative impacts that are way more balanced and add spiciness and variety to each playthrough.

    • holiday@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I have one campaign currently at the start of act 3. Another that is about to start act 2. And a multi-player campaign with my buddies that is like 2/3 of the way through act 1.

      If you like DnD and/or CRPGs you will be not find a better game.

    • ChrislyBear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I played Divinity: Original Sin 2 twice with two groups in multiplayer and it was a blast every time. Sure, you won’t 100% the game, but that’s what makes it replayable.

      I imagine BG3 isn’t different in that regard. I also have just started, but it gives very similar vibes to D:OS2.

    • SokathHisEyesOpen@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s incredibly enjoyable. It doesn’t force anything other than the consequences of your actions. What you do in this game heavily impacts the people and world around you. Treat your decisions as if they matter, because they do, sometimes more than you can imagine.

      You can replay the game with completely different outcomes to just about everything. I started my second playthrough and already the world is very different than it was in my first playthrough.