• Trump exits Paris climate agreement, again, and issues a flood of anti-climate orders
• Swarm of jellyfish swimming in bioluminescence looks ‘magical’ – but it’s a warning sign
• Climate change could cut the economy in half, and we’re not ready for it
• The world is on track for between 1.9 and 3.7°C of warming by 2100
• Trump stocks EPA with oil, gas and chemical lobbyists
Note: When reading news coverage from any corporate-owned source — a newspaper, TV station or network, etc — the facts are generally factual, but the slant favors the rich and powerful.
I’ve now seen “corporate capitalism” on more than one occasion and I don’t understand what distinction it’s trying to draw from plain capitalism. What am I missing?
Corporate, meaning the legal protections of incorporation, scaled to preposterous size.
Every Denny’s should be blown to smithereens, but I’m not opposed to the kind of capitalism where a couple of people own a restaurant, paying some people a decent wage and feeding me ham, & eggs for $8.99.
thanks for the explanation, I can see your point which I think is that some narrow and heavily regulated capitalist systems would be compatible with sustainable living.
I don’t see it as practical or meaningful enough of a distinction but it clarifies things.
In theory, there is also “laissez-faire capitalism” which also boils down to deregulation, but in a less direct way.
Yeah I guess I’m wondering what form of capitalism OP thinks doesn’t have this problem, as implied to me by the specificity.