• CrayonRosary@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    I didn’t change the subject; I broadened it slightly. You were talking just about humor, I’m talking about all of the choices the author has to make. Both the humor and the point of the comic are under the same umbrella.

    • acockworkorange
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      1 month ago

      To claim you’re broadening you’d have to have engaged with my point, not sidestepped it. You’re arguing in bad faith.

      • CrayonRosary@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Dude, I wasn’t even arguing against your point. I was providing an alternative view in the same space: that of the author’s choices. I literally wasn’t even arguing. Chill out.

      • Mac
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I think you might be in the wrong class.

      • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        You’re looking for a fight like a bad troll. “Bad faith argument”? The reply you got addresses your point but you don’t seem to understand the discussion.