• burgersc12
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      26
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Thanks bro. I mean I was just trying to say he could have chosen to not portray a dude who was still alive and could potentially be an asshole in the future.

      • _stranger_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 hours ago

        The movie exposed the masses to zuck’s shittyness, and he’s an actor who vaguely looks like him.

        Be mad at him for his Lex Luthor and that one movie Vivarium

      • Baylahoo@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Actors choose to play people who are already assholes. They don’t feel the need to say they don’t agree the values of super sadistic mass murderer number 5. This guy did a dramatized documentary film and is now clarifying he doesn’t like the original person’s values, just acting. It should be unnecessary, but he feels he needs to clarify. A role doesn’t equal they admire the character. He’s clarifying for people like you who assume it does.

        • burgersc12
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          15 hours ago

          What? Of course the role and actor are separate. But if he doesn’t want to be associated with his previous roles then he should go back in time and not portray the guy he doesn’t want to be associated with. If he can’t do that, then he has to live with the association and make the most of it, like he is trying to do with the rest of his comments about Zuckerberg.