• stoy@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    Cool, but using AI means that we won’t be able to completely trust the results

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s not the AI you’re thinking of. This has nothing to do with image creation or large language models.

      • MurrayL@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        2 days ago

        Good (but sad) demo of how LLMs and stable diffusion have completely poisoned the term AI to the point that even legit use-cases get shit on by association.

        • cabbage@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Or how it has normalized using AI for everything between heaven and earth, when what is actually going on is machine learning. AI implies that the machine is thinking for itself, which of course leads (reasonable) people to draw conclusions that it’s not a very reliable source.

        • _cnt0@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          Nothing in existence that has been labeled AI is AI. If AI (actual meaning of the words) exists, it’s in some secret facility and we don’t know about it. AI outside of fiction is a meaningless marketing term. That was already the case before LLMs and stable diffusion.

            • _cnt0@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              20 hours ago

              Let’s go ahead and call Trump’s politics “liberal justice”. It’s all just meaningless words that we can associate with whatever we want. That’s more along the lines of how “AI” is used in marketing.

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                20 hours ago

                Or maybe we can accept that language is fluid and what you want something to mean and what everyone else thinks it means are in no way the same and never will be.

                That said, Trump is 100% a classical liberal so I’m highly amused that was the example you decided to go with.

                • _cnt0@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  19 hours ago

                  Yah, right, and Hitler was a communist. /s

                  I’ve no time/energy to deal with that level of trolling right now.

                  • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    19 hours ago

                    Amazing. You are so invested in being correct that you didn’t even bother looking to see what I’m talking about and just declared it to be trolling.

                    Which also does not fit the original definition of trolling.

                    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troll_(slang)

                    Apparently there is only one instance where the original definition is the only one that matters to you.

            • _cnt0@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              No. That’s another bullshit marketing term people came up with when confronted with the fact that their “AI” contains no I.

              • MurrayL@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                19 hours ago

                No, it’s a term that creates a meaningful distinction between what you seem to think AI means and what it actually means.

                If you refuse to accept either term then I can only assume you’re just being stubborn for the sake of it.

                • _cnt0@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  16 hours ago

                  A distinction necessitated by marketing abusing it and watering it down beyond usefulness. Rinse and repeat and we’ll be talking about SAAGAITSRI (super advanced actual general artificial intelligence that shows real intelligence) in 10 to 20 years.