Probably quite early in his reign, as the portrait looks quite a bit like Severus Alexander.

        • EvilCartyen@feddit.dkOPM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          27 days ago

          Yes, definitely, but there might be some element of playing the part of the soldier from the frontiers - the brutal barbarian - to keep people in line. Still, Herodian does mention that he was of an impressive size and he’s generally more reliable than the Historia Augusta, right?

          • PugJesus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            27 days ago

            Yes, definitely, but there might be some element of playing the part of the soldier from the frontiers - the brutal barbarian - to keep people in line.

            Whether propaganda or reality, I love the depiction. Not a great Emperor, but what a memorable look!

            Still, Herodian does mention that he was of an impressive size and he’s generally more reliable than the Historia Augusta, right?

            More reliable than the Historia Augusta is beating the fastest snail at the footrace XD

            But Herodian is generally (though not universally) considered reliable, yes.

            • EvilCartyen@feddit.dkOPM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              27 days ago

              He is indeed an interesting character and emperor, and I suppose his ascend is the start of the soldier-emperors and the Crisis in earnest. The next 50 years are going to be rough for the Romans.

              Which reminds me, I should post an Aurelian coin one of these days.

              • PugJesus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                27 days ago

                Which reminds me, I should post an Aurelian coin one of these days.

                I recently read a really fascinating theory that Aurelian’s reforms were what triggered the hyperinflation of the late 3rd century. The basic idea being that his reforms to revaluate the currency were what led to the final collapse of the kind of pseudofiat and pseudorepresentative valuation that Roman currency had been coasting on, suggesting that the ~100% price inflation up until then was actually mild compared to how little silver actually remained in the coins.

                Not sure how much I buy it, but it’s something I’ve been meaning to read more about!

                • EvilCartyen@feddit.dkOPM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  27 days ago

                  I don’t know much about the fiscal history of the Roman Empire, except that it seems like they didn’t really understand inflation. But then again - I don’t think that can be true, can it? It seems like such a fundamental and basic concept that it’s hard to imagine a sophisticated society not having a basic grasp of it.

                  Can you recommend a good source for the fiscal history of the Roman Empire?

    • EvilCartyen@feddit.dkOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      27 days ago

      I don’t actually remember, this was bought via FB messenger many years ago (2017?) and I have since deleted my account. Prices are quite a bit higher post covid anyway…

      Edit: But it wasn’t terribly expensive - something like 40-60 USD at the most.

          • khannie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            27 days ago

            Not yet, but this community and an undying love for Roman history has made me seriously consider it. :)

              • khannie@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                27 days ago

                I did just take a look on one of the sidebar sites after reading your post. I have a question if you don’t mind.

                I came across this one which looks a decent enough starter and is quite cheap. Is there a reason those more dirty coins aren’t put into something like a light acid bath to remove the gunk?

                • EvilCartyen@feddit.dkOPM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  27 days ago

                  An acid bath would strip off all the silver and ruin it, but it’s conceivable you could clean it mechanically and make it a little bit prettier. But for the price it’s a nice coin indeed!

                  Edit: But don’t try to clean it more now, it really is something which takes tens of hours and is an expert pursuit.