• kevincox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      3 days ago

      This was intentional. The goal was to discourage the adoption of non-free codecs. They were partially successful, now AV1 is very widely supported (basically only older iThings that don’t have hardware decoding support don’t support it) which is a huge win because anyone can now deliver video on the web without needing a license to a proprietary codec. I would consider this fact alone a huge benefit and worth them holding other browsers asses to the flame.

      • Scoopta@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        I definitely think this was a good move. Proprietary video codecs are silly and I’m glad VP9 and AV1 have been so widely adopted. I do wish more services used them instead of h.264 but at least it’s something.

  • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Why do I want h265. Didnt the copyright on h264 finally run out, so now I can use it without a license finally?

    I’m not going to be using h265

    • Zetta
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      4 days ago

      Why, use an open source standard. AV1 for the win