Why does it feel that the evil sides globally are winning. Even evil people are winning. Why?

  • rational_lib@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    37 minutes ago

    The internet. It led to the following:

    • Good social change occurred very rapidly from the 1990s-2010s, causing highly motivated pushback from those who didn’t like the changes
    • Rising wealth inequality caused by tech billionaires increased incentives and capability for a small number of extremely wealthy people to seize control of media and political power centers
    • Foreign dictator governments became more able to more easily spread pro-dictator propaganda
    • Media became more decentralized, leading to some good things but also the hijacking of our psychology to spread fear and disgust for the sake of grabbing attention
    • JOMusic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 minutes ago

      I would just like to push back and say that the Internet was an open public project, and it has helped countless people across the world. Every single problematic tech that people are pointing to at the moment are closed-source commercial projects.

      That is Capitalism at work.

  • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    33 minutes ago

    the hard answer: the voting populace is the single stupidest form of combined intelligence to ever exist, im pretty sure 3 children under the age of 7 in a room would have a higher average IQ than any state in america when measuring the voting populace.

    Voting is a joke. People don’t take it seriously, it’s all vibes based, and those vibes are horrendously unreliable and meaningless.

    the soft answer: it is, for now. It will change, just give it time. It’s inevitable.

  • WhatSay@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    47 minutes ago

    Change requires a massive push, and apparently people need to suffer much much more, to inspire that momentum.

  • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    Well, I’d say it’s because they don’t even hide it anymore. They know they can do whatever they want, and get away with it.

    Enshitification is a real thing, and companies and evil people are being blatant about it, because they know they don’t have to hide it because they know they can’t be stopped.

    It sucks. I hate it. I wish we could do something about it.

  • LeninOnAPrayer@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Because class war is being raged but most of the global north working class don’t have any class consciousness. Capitalism is working on doing what it has done to the global South for decades but this time to the global North. Fascism is Imperialism turned inward. Welcome to the rest of our lives.

    • phlegmy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      26 minutes ago

      What has capitalism done to the global south?
      Is that just a metaphor, or are you literally talking about Australia, New Zealand, South Africa, South America and Antarctica?

      Sorry, I’m just a little confused about what you mean.

  • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Because the slow decay of the capitalist order that has been occurring since the neoliberal turn has reached the point where it’s effects are being felt in the global North

    • LeninOnAPrayer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      Just left a nearly an identical explanation. Refreshed and saw this comment. Well said. Fascism is Imperialism turned inward.

  • ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Because good natured people don’t want conflict so they avoid it.

    Bad natured people actively seek conflict and engage with it whenever possible.

    Evil never sleeps. Peace does.

  • randon31415@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Evil use to hide - but through Trump’s no filter twitter postings, Musk’s self-aggrandizing incompetence, and Russia’s realization that they no longer have to hide their evil-doing, a lot of the evil these days is just out in the open.

    Imagine a world where a competent president is hiding behind close doors planning a way to defund USAID and starve millions of people. Planning behind close doors cutting medicare by 1 trillion dollars, killing thousands of Americans, and using that money to fund a trillion dollar tax break for the mega rich. You wouldn’t know any of that is happening.

    Now it is front page news, and people are reacting by boycotting Amazon for one day on the 28th.

  • SLVRDRGN@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Because good times create weak people. Weak people create difficult times. Difficult times create good people. Good people create good times.

    I think we’re ushering into the era of weak people creating difficult times, after having good times for a while.

  • Wren@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    Because sensationalism creates ad revenue. So the news you receive from any side of any story is going to try and make you as angry/scared as possible so you’re more apt to share it and spread the word- they then use the page bits and time spent on their sites to generate more ad revenue.

    Stay away from far-left, liberal, democratic, conservative, republican, and MAGA-affiliated sites. They’re guaranteed to not be honest with you. Instead, stick with independent and unbiased sources like Reuters and Associated Press.

    • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      2 hours ago

      stick with independent and unbiased sources like Reuters and Associated Press.

      Lol

      • Wren@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Considering how freely and often you use terms like “shitlibs,” I can see how something like this might make you laugh.

        Is it the over seventy prestige in journalism awards between them that you find funny?

        • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Anyone still trying to say AP and Reuters are independent and unbiased after the way they’ve covered Israel’s genocide is just revealing their own extreme ideological bias.

          Also, the whole concept of saying to avoid liberal sources and then pointing to liberal sources while saying that they’re “unbiased” (as if bias free sources are even possible) is a peak example of fish not knowing what water is.