Thanks everyone for your active participation here. We knew this would have a lot of interest and so we’ve waited to dive into the conversation because we see some themes emerging that I’ll respond to broadly here. The main concerns I’m noting are around the license agreements we declare, our use of data for AI, and our Acceptable Use Policy. Below are a few clarifications to each of these areas.

  • macniel@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Even the mere existence of AI which usage is opt-in is a so called slippery slope.

    • simple@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Not really. Other companies forced AI to appeal to investors and look for new ways to trap consumers in subscriptions. Mozilla added free, privacy-friendly addons because people asked for it. Big difference.

      • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        We’re already seeing other companies shoehorn in chatbots into everything to try to make up for the fact that the trend didn’t really catch on.