• marl_karx@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Thats cool and all but why do they compare charging an EV to refueling a tank? Who drives a tank?

  • Munrock ☭@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    2 days ago

    BYD has various meanings:

    For Chinese, it’s biyadi

    For Westerners, it’s Build Your Dreams

    For Western capitalist auto makers, it’s Bringing Your Downfall

  • Oldseeker6062@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    This could be good, but as a EV owner I am not convinced that I need a recharging speed that is this fast. I own a Chevy Bolt ( known for its sloooow charging speed) and even when we travel longer distances and need to charge stopping for 20 minutes would be great ( thats a bathroom break and snacks) so I applaud the technology but I think pushing the envelope down this far is not what most people would need.

    • porcupine@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 days ago

      Renters exist, and many of them don’t have the option to install charging infrastructure in their homes everywhere and every time they move. Their options today are:

      • don’t buy an EV
      • only rent housing that’s compatible with their vehicle
      • plan their day around publicly accessible charging station availability

      Faster charging lets people get in and out of charging stations faster, which lets more people charge, which makes EVs a more practical option for people other than single family homeowners with garages

      • Oldseeker6062@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        21 hours ago

        That is true ! I was just thinking out loud about “ How Fast “ we should worry about/ invest in vs getting more fast ( 160kw+ ) charging stations for the general public to use.

      • Pili@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        2 days ago

        I think fast charging negatively impact battery life because of the heat it produces. It would be nice to be able to choose the amperage we want for a specific charge, when we’re not in a hurry.

        • cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 days ago

          Which is why i still think that the best solution at the moment is still battery swapping stations. That way you get the best of both worlds. Your vehicle is back at full charge within a couple of minutes (the only limitation is how fast the mechanical operations can be performed), and the batteries themselves can be charged as slowly as needed to preserve long term battery life.

        • 小莱卡@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          2 days ago

          i mean the engineers developing this must be taking that into account, we don’t have to be worrying about this.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmygrad.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          2 days ago

          I would imagine they’ve considered batter degradation here. It could be that the approach they use doesn’t cause significant damage to the battery.

          • Awillia91@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            2 days ago

            They actually tell you it’s better to charge it with the slow charger most of the time. The fast charger does have a negative effect on battery life. I don’t know how significant it is though.

            • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmygrad.mlOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              2 days ago

              It’d be interesting to see what the difference is there. The ideal would be if you have a charger capable of rapid charging, and you can dial it down if you want to assuming there is a negative effect on the battery.

        • cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          If anything the fact that it’s Chinese should be viewed as a good guarantee that it works. Not because the Chinese are inherently superior or can’t make mistakes, but because China is a huge market and a product that has already been sold to and used by millions of Chinese consumers has effectively undergone more rigorous testing than almost anything else you can imagine.

          How much more “proven” can something get? There is no better test of a technology than it being successfully sold and widely accepted in a country as gigantic as China. This should be entirely uncontroversial, it is just simple math.

          The Chinese domestic market for everything EV related is incredibly competitive compared to what we have in the West. Most Chinese brands don’t even make it out of China (because there are so many Chinese brands and because China itself is a sufficiently large market that they don’t need to expand internationally to be successful) and those that do, do so because they have proven to be a cut above the rest.

        • v_pp@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          26
          ·
          2 days ago

          The downside is… that it’s Chinese? BYD products are way more proven than any EV technology America has ever touched. I think you’re just racist.

        • Xavienth@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          2 days ago

          I accept these points if you exclude “Chinese” lol how does the nation of origin have anything to do with it?

          People say made in China stuff is cheap and unreliable. Bruh they make everything, not just the cheap stuff.