not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 天前we all made it a long time agolemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square144fedilinkarrow-up11.52Karrow-down118cross-posted to: degrowth@slrpnk.net
arrow-up11.5Karrow-down1imagewe all made it a long time agolemmy.blahaj.zonenot_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 天前message-square144fedilinkcross-posted to: degrowth@slrpnk.net
minus-squarebuddascrayon@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11arrow-down2·edit-215 小时前We also need to outlaw landlords. Owning land is not a job and it’s certainly not a business.
minus-squaretrashpanda@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·15 小时前Only raccoons could be owners of land :D
minus-squaresilasmariner@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·13 小时前I think landlords make a lot of sense for commercially-zoned property, and for residentially there needs to be some way to live somewhere even if you can’t afford the mortgage deposit. So there’s nuance here that needs addressing IMO.
minus-squareSuperNovaStar@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·8 小时前We could just… give everyone a place to live. Then there’s no such thing as “can’t afford a mortgage.”
minus-squaresilasmariner@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 小时前Do people get to choose where they live in this scenario, or do we just allocate housing based on where’s currently unoccupied?
We also need to outlaw landlords. Owning land is not a job and it’s certainly not a business.
Only raccoons could be owners of land :D
Hard Agree.
I think landlords make a lot of sense for commercially-zoned property, and for residentially there needs to be some way to live somewhere even if you can’t afford the mortgage deposit. So there’s nuance here that needs addressing IMO.
We could just… give everyone a place to live. Then there’s no such thing as “can’t afford a mortgage.”
Do people get to choose where they live in this scenario, or do we just allocate housing based on where’s currently unoccupied?