This is rarely mentioned. Because of its design, Starship can’t just go to the Moon, it first requires orbital refueling (from other Starships). NASA estimates they would need at least 15, but that was before the Starship payload capacity was downgraded.

  • Des [she/her, they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 days ago

    that would be delightful.

    I haven’t been following spaceflight lately because everything is so doom but they are having repeat engine failures right? is it because of the methane fuel or the engine design themselves?

    • Lovely_sombrero [he/him]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      A couple of engines in the lower stage always fail, but with only a small dummy load that isn’t a problem for the test flight. Something in the upper stage exploded, probably a ruptured fuel line.

      rupturing

      • Des [she/her, they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 days ago

        Ahhh so we are basically at the “everyone left at Space-X that isn’t totally burnt out are failson Elon Musk fankids and cultists and his company has lost institutional capability and can’t build rockets anymore”?

        • Lovely_sombrero [he/him]@hexbear.netOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          I think the initial idea is so bad that engineers have a hard problem working around that. Stainless steel should make it easier to use in cold & hot situations, so they can save weight on the heat shield (and it is already very heavy), but now they have rupturing fuel lines and engines.