Seriously though, the USA is virtually always bad.

  • Infamousblt [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    1 year ago

    Love that you completely ignored the part where the US involvement led to them brutalizing and murdering countless completely innocent civilians. That part is pretty inconvenient to your argument that they were somehow the good guys here so yeah it is a pretty safe bet to ignore it. I’d love to hear you defend it though I’m sure you’ll do Uncle Sam proud

    • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      But it’s irrelevant to the question. The question was whether it was good the US joined WWII. Even accounting for the atrocities, I don’t know anyone who would say the US shouldn’t have joined the war.

      • Infamousblt [any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        33
        ·
        1 year ago

        No the question was is there a time when the US was objectively good. You used WW2 as an example. And then ignored all the completely heinous shit the US did during WW2.

        • Lochat [none/use name]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          33
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          SIR, MY PUBLIC EDUCATION HISTORY CLASS SAID WE WERE HEROES AFTER FORCING ME TO SAY THE PLEDGE OF ALLIEGANCE EVERY MORNING, HOW DARE YOU QUESTION DROPPING NUKES ON CIVILIANS, PARTICULARLY THE SECOND ONE WHERE JAPAN’S SURRENDER ALREADY WENT FROM INEVIETABLE TO UNDENIABLE AFTER THE FIRST. I AM A HERO BY VIRTUE OF BEING BORN IN AMERICA. A “FEW” HORRIFIC, CIVILIAN MASS MURDERS IS MY DEFINITION OF OBJECTIVELY GOOD.

        • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          But it can still be objectively good they joined even taking into account the atrocities. It doesn’t need to be all good to be good over all.

      • Lochat [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        No, he asked if they were objectively good in that war, which they weren’t even fucking close. At best they were a grey-moralist lesser of two evil, but the fact you conflate that with “good” is exactly why you’ll never comprehend any situation with any nuance. In your mind it’s always “WW2 USA GOOD GUYS SAVED WORLD” like some lead-poisoned brain damaged boomer desperately trying to live voraciously through low-rent nationalist propaganda. I’d say, yes, America was the lesser of two evils compared to Nazi Germany and Japan, and the fact that’s the closest you can get to “good” and the political parties you need to compare yourself to, to look better in comparison to someone, proves Infamousblt’s point.

        The closest to “objectively good” America’s actions has been in a situation is “well, it’s not as bad as letting Nazi Germany take over all of Europe” and that’s not good, that’s horror.

        • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          The closest to “objectively good” America’s actions has been in a situation is “well, it’s not as bad as letting Nazi Germany take over all of Europe” and that’s not good, that’s horror.

          That’s just the largest example that comes to mind.

          I thought the question was ‘has the US done any good actions,’ which would qualify WWII. If instead the question was asking ‘has the US done any actions that are entirely and completely perfect’ I would say no nation has.