Starfield and Baldur’s Gate 3 both weigh the player down with encumbrance. Love it or hate it, it seems like it’s here to stay.

  • Mothra
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    1 year ago

    Amazing people make articles on… Nothing, essentially? It’s just encumbrance, right?

    I was expecting it would at least go into detail and explain or compare how many items or units of weight you can carry, if it slows you down gradually or if it pretty much freezes you on the spot, differences with previous well known franchise games but no, none of that either.

    • Crismus@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      I love how in Starfield your encumbrance and movement are aided or harmed by planetary gravity.

      On a low gravity world I have had over 800/200 and run along with no issues. While on a planet with 1.6 or higher and you really can’t ignore the slowdown. You just can’t fast travel, but you don’t stop like in Skyrim, so I think that’s a positive step in the right direction.

      • Rhaedas@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s not even realistic. I know that Starfield isn’t meant to be a simulator, but if you put in something to try and be “real”, you should do it right. Gravity would affect the weight of something, but the inertia is still the same. Moving and stopping a big object in space with no gravity at all is still hard to do.

      • Mothra
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Cool! I haven’t played yet, I like how that sounds