• Decipher0771@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 年前

      Different tools. Speed disk was a disk defragmenter, DriveSpace was whole disk compression. The Norton tool you’d have used a lot if you used DriveSpace was Norton Disk Doctor.

      • sj_zero@lotide.fbxl.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 年前

        And as I recall, Norton had all the tools long before MS-DOS included them by default. It was sort of a dick move by Microsoft, the sort of thing they’re famous for now.

        • ksaj@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 个月前

          Raise your hand if you used to sit and watch Norton’s defragger do its thing! 🤩

        • Decipher0771@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 年前

          DOS has always? had chkdsk, but ndd had a knack for being able to recover data from minor corruptions way better than chkdsk did. Scandisk (dos 6 version of chkdsk) was just a prettier face, ndd was still better.

          Between ndd, Spinrite, and I can’t remember the name of the undelete tools, I saved a lot of homework assignments.

          • sj_zero@lotide.fbxl.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 年前

            chkdsk in dos never had the ability to scan the disk surface for defects, ndd did that, and then magically scandisk showed up and looked awfully similar to ndd.

            But I agree, some really great tools. And sysinfo was our de facto “how fast is this thing?” for years.