Amazon.com’s Whole Foods Market doesn’t want to be forced to let workers wear “Black Lives Matter” masks and is pointing to the recent US Supreme Court ruling permitting a business owner to refuse services to same-sex couples to get federal regulators to back off.

National Labor Relations Board prosecutors have accused the grocer of stifling worker rights by banning staff from wearing BLM masks or pins on the job. The company countered in a filing that its own rights are being violated if it’s forced to allow BLM slogans to be worn with Whole Foods uniforms.

Amazon is the most prominent company to use the high court’s June ruling that a Christian web designer was free to refuse to design sites for gay weddings, saying the case “provides a clear roadmap” to throw out the NLRB’s complaint.

The dispute is one of several in which labor board officials are considering what counts as legally-protected, work-related communication and activism on the job.

  • serial_crusher@lemmy.basedcount.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    Agreed, if I ran a grocery store chain I’d just have the employees wear uniforms with no personal expression.

    At the end of the day it’s the business’s right to set whatever policy they want though. If the government decides employees have a constitutionally protected right to wear whatever they want to wear to work, we’re gonna see a lot of crazy bullshit.

    • Blake [he/him]@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      If the government decides employees have a constitutionally protected right to wear whatever they want to wear to work, we’re gonna see a lot of crazy bullshit

      Would it be a bad thing? I think with some sensible exceptions it would be a very good thing to permit free expression as the default.