I’m speaking of online data harvested through apps, websites, hardware (such as phones/streaming devices).

I mean if multiple versions of the same harvested data are being sold, wouldn’t the value decrease because of the competition? When it comes to aggregate data, how much financial value can there really be in knowing that a million office workers just clicked on the same cat meme?

How does the quantity of time and expense toward “personalization” not simply overshadow the return, given that no one can click on even a small percentage of those numerous ads, let alone buy the shit being advertised?

It just seems like there would come a time when the value of user data is sucked dry, or at least significantly decreased.

  • agent_flounder@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hm I wonder if generative AI could somehow be used to create fake user behavior to obscure my real behavior.

        • Dr Cog
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          It mostly benefits the website that is being visited. If an ad company sells ad spots that don’t convert to sales, the organizations buying the ad spots will be less likely to buy them in the future, potentially hurting the ad company

          • Kimano@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah but this also results in the site receiving less money from ads, also hurting them in the long run. Really the solution is to pay for the services you enjoy, and acknowledge the age-old “if the service is free, you are the product”.

            • Nibodhika@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              It has always been my understanding that sites and apps get paid X cents for displaying an ad, and Y cents (where Y is larger than X) whenever someone actually clicks an ad on their site. So this would in theory help the website.

    • betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago
      Slight spoiler for Neal Stephenson's book "Fall (or: Dodge in Hell)".

      That idea is used early-ish in the book to muddy the waters and regain some privacy for a significant character. There’s a subplot involving a conspiracy theory being intentionally spread through online message boards and this character becomes a target of harassment. By flooding the sites with a full spectrum of scandals and red herrings, they’re able to drown out the pieces of legitimate personal info and confuse people enough that they move on to new topics.