It’s hard to imagine a less contentious or more innocent word than “and.”

But how to interpret that simple conjunction has prompted a complicated legal fight that lands in the Supreme Court on Oct. 2, the first day of its new term. What the justices decide could affect thousands of prison sentences each year.

Federal courts across the country disagree about whether the word, as it is used in a bipartisan 2018 criminal justice overhaul, indeed means “and” or whether it means “or.” Even an appellate panel that upheld a longer sentence called the structure of the provision “perplexing.”

The Supreme Court has stepped in to settle the dispute.

It’s the kind of task the justices — and maybe their English teachers — love. The case requires the close parsing of a part of a federal statute, the First Step Act, which aimed in part to reduce mandatory minimum sentences and give judges more discretion.

  • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    And as a programmer, I’m pretty sure that the constitution is littered with race conditions.

    • AmberPrince@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t know anything about programming but there are semicolons all over the constitution and I think you need those to code stuff.

    • bobman@unilem.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Fun fact: Slavery is not mentioned once in the US constitution.

      It is always referred to as the ‘peculiar institution.’

      Shitbags knew they were fuckheads all the way back then. It’s just up to the rest of society to hold them accountable.