“As you know, we’re playing catch-up. Thirteen years at not meeting industry standards is kind of difficult to catch up on, but by ‘28 we’ll be fully caught up, and then we’ll go on our five-year cycle," he said. “We are trimming trees; as we stand here today, we have about 50 or 60 crews out there.”

  • reddig33@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m willing to pay slightly more to bury the lines bit by bit every month so we don’t end up with the greenbelt on fire like what happened in California.

    It amazes me that no one complains about the cost of burying gas lines, water lines, and sewer lines — but somehow it’s just too expensive to bury power lines.

    • protist
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The city is burying lines bit by bit. More than 50% of AE’s lines are already buried, and the city especially tries to bury lines with all new home and road construction, just like those other 3 are buried with new construction. What is much more expensive is burying them after the fact, which requires tearing up existing infrastructure. Also, building and maintaining the gas, water, and sewer infrastructure is incredibly expensive but literally necessary, where burying electric transmission lines is not necessary. If you’ve ever had to have work done to repair a sewer line you know how much more expensive, labor intensive, destructive, and time consuming that work is than anything electrical

      • netburnr@lemmy.worldOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That appears to be true with all the new builds in southeast. I see very few transmission lines and lots of road side boxes in the new developments around me