• Drstrange2love@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      2 years ago

      That was how liberals endured during slavery in my country, that’s why we have absurdities like the sexagenarian law and the free womb, which artificially made slavery last longer.

    • HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      The abolition of witch burnings is a bit extremist, we need a middle ground.

      The abolition of sacrificing children to the devil is a bit extremist, we need a middle ground.

      The abolition of blowing up planets with the Death Star is a bit extremist, we need a middle ground.

      The abolition of killing half the universe with a glove is a bit extremist, we need a middle ground.

  • Absolute@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    2 years ago

    When you don’t really have any idea what either capitalism or communism are but you have somehow convinced yourself that you’re way smarter than everyone else

  • JucheBot1988@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 years ago

    Extreme Unchecked Communism sounds like the title of one of those badly-translated videos of DPRK music which proliferated on the Jucheweb about ten years ago.

  • ps1_lenin@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 years ago

    Oh yeah let’s just implement communism without central planning and—hey wait a minute why do we have capitalism again?

  • EuthanatosMurderhobo@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 years ago

    Unchecked communism is an oxymoron, but why would I expect a redditor to know.

    Middle ground between exploitative and public economy? Hey, fellas, let’s find middle ground between dead and alive real quick.

    P.S. Oh wait, that’s Juche necromancy smh

  • GloriousDoubleK@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    Can we make a sequel to Monopoly please?

    Call it Social Democracy vs. Capital. You have a group of capitalists who are trying to win classic monopoly and then you have a small group of players who “run the bank” and are the SocDems who tries to put in regulation to prevent monopoly.

    The goal of the capitalist players is to either win ghr monopoly game and the capitalists are supposed to circumvent the DemSocs in order to defeat them. They can sue them or spend money to lobby against regulations, ect.