Do they think the Catalan Anarchists had no bourgeois blood on their hands? Do they think the Makhnovites never executed counterrevolutionaries? Fucking idiots. I preferred it when anarchists actually threw pipe bombs.

  • Nematodes [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m aware of my own post is this some sort of got cha?

    when the weather became less fair.

    Are you talking about when y’all openly bash anarchist? Calling them libs?

    Yeah I’m not really cool with that.

    Your comment has no real critique of my ideology. Just shows that isn’t room here for anarachist of any kind.

    • diegeticscream[all]🔻@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      1 year ago

      Your comment has no real critique of my ideology. Just shows that isn’t room here for anarachist of any kind.

      You’re currently commenting in Lemmygrad, an explicitly ML instance, in the “leftist infighting” community.

      Your post above was in Hexbear, a “left unity” instance, which has rules against sectarianism.

      If you’re not interested in seeing posts critical of anarchism, it might be better to block this community, or avoid those discussions/posts in Lemmygrad.

      • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        “Don’t critique what I believe, don’t tell me what to dooooooo” is like a fortress of rhetorical immunity for some people, as long as they complain loud enough about how everyone else is bad and that they’re “disappointed” in them.

        • Nematodes [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          Y’all aren’t critizing idoleogy y’all are just calling me a lib or an angry teenager…

          This comment once again has no real critique. Am I not allowed to complain?

          • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            26
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Y’all didn’t either. From the start this was “you guys suck how dare you criticize what I believe” posting.

            I am not even sure you have an examined and understood ideology at this point, just vibes.

            Am I not allowed to complain?

            Your hypocrisy is amazing here considering your “y’all” condemnations that are centered on how you don’t like your particular takes being complained about.

            • Alaskaball [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              What anarchist books have you read that you thought were good

              Sarcastically: I’m a bit of an expert on anarchism you see. I once read a meme on r/complete@narchy back in the day

      • Nematodes [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        I can deal with post critizing anarchy. I’m just not seeing that. Alls I see are post calling anarchist fake. Or calling them libs. Or calling them angry teenagers.

        Soo what it sounds like is there isn’t room for anarchist on lemmygrad? Are you willing to share with me some critiques of anarchism that are not based in literal name calling?

        Cuz I will read, but I’m not gonna stick around and get called a lib over and over again.

        • QueerCommie@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          25
          ·
          1 year ago

          We are calling fake anarchists fake. No one said anarchists as a whole were fake. Why are you taking this personally. All the way from the title (self styled “anarchists”) it should’ve been clear it was criticizing a specific type of person laying false claim to the ideology of anarchism, not the whole.

          • Nematodes [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            OK but these are the only posts I see on here regarding anarchy. I see pretty Much “anarkiddys” And things like “anarchist just wanna be petty Bourgeoisie”. Or memes just talking trash.

            (self styled “anarchists”) it should’ve been clear

            This alone doesn’t convey that there are accept able forms of anarchy on this community. Its just bashing.

            • QueerCommie@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              No it doesn’t, I don’t know why you interpret it that way. Suggesting someone we don’t like has illegitimate claim to an ideology suggests someone we like has legitimate claim to it. Imagine Alex Jones says “these “conservatives” in the White House are evil,” it should be clear he likes conservatism but thinks neocons have an illegitimate claim to it.

              • Nematodes [he/him]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                Suggesting someone we don’t like has illegitimate claim to an ideology suggests someone we like has legitimate claim to it.

                I guess… Although I’m a little confused.

                Imagine Alex Jones says “these “conservatives” in the white are evil,”

                But this is different than the OP. This clearly differentiates a sub group. The conservatives in white

                If I said these “conservatives” are full of shit. It kinda critizes the term “conservative” as well. And those who call themselves that.

                Once again, while I see your point. I still haven’t seen a earnest critique of anarchy on this community. Maybe you can link one?

        • diegeticscream[all]🔻@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Soo what it sounds like is there isn’t room for anarchist on lemmygrad?

          Again, Lemmygrad and Hexbear are different websites with different rules.

          If you’re interested in being accepted as an anarchist, Hexbear would be more welcoming.

          Are you willing to share with me some critiques of anarchism that are not based in literal name calling?

          I’m not responding to you to argue with you, I’m trying to help you have a less frustrating lemmy experience.

    • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Are you talking about when y’all openly bash anarchist?

      Y’all honestly make me so sad.

      Yall are a fuckin disappointment.

      Only you are allowed to make blanket statements about other ideologies. Only you.

      Your comment has no real critique of my ideology.

      When you make one besides your “you all suck, but you’re not allowed to stereotype me based on my hot takes” take, maybe. Not looking good so far.

        • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          My critique of this community is there no room for anarchist here of any kind.

          of any kind

          I don’t think you speak for the entirety of anarchism. Your version of it hasn’t yet presented anything here except “you guys suck” and “how dare you criticize what I believe” hypocrisy takes.

        • redtea@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m fairly sure there are several well respected anarchists on Lemmygrad.

          You seem to be making a judgement based on one post, which you seem to have interpreted to mean something very different to what I thought it was saying. It comes off a little bit wrecker tbh, considering the ‘anarchist’ in the op is clearly qualified.

          If you did want an ML critique of anarchism, you could try: https://en.prolewiki.org/wiki/Library:Anarchism_or_socialism%3F

    • QueerCommie@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      We’re calling libs who call themselves “anarchists” libs. Most of us have not condemned all anarchists.