Two counterarguments:

National September 11 Memorial  Museum

  • ME5SENGER_24@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    8 months ago

    5 Star General, former President, Dwight D. Eisenhower had this to say about the Military Industrial complex. It rings true today as much as it did in 1961

    SPEECH

    • chaogomu@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Eisenhower was the main force behind building the Military Industrial complex.

      It’s kind of like a drunken, pantsless party guest saying that there’s a bunch of shit and vomit in the bathroom, and that it will certainly be a problem, but they’re going home now, so you should clean it up.

      Only instead of shit and vomit, it’s a bunch of rich assholes making money by killing poor people.

  • Doorbook@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    He should name one security argument of supporting “Isreal”.

    A political system where the president can say whatever without an opposition is useless…

  • NecoArcKbinAccount@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    yes because bombing pali children will save us from a sovergen debt crisis and a bunch of other issues that resulted in the US dumping tens of billions in “foreign aid” while allowing the country to rot with a shitty 2 party system.

    but the GDP went up!!!

    when was the last time the GDP actually improved your life?

  • davel [he/him]@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    8 months ago

    More evidence to the contrary today: FBI says Hamas attack on Israel inspiring ‘new level’ of terror threat against US

    The head of the FBI warned a congressional hearing on Tuesday that the Hamas attack on Israel has given terrorists inspiration “the likes of which we haven’t seen” since the rise of Isis a decade ago.

    Christopher Wray told the US Senate committee on homeland security and governmental affairs that while the terrorism threat had been high throughout 2023, “the ongoing war in the Middle East has raised the threat of an attack against Americans in the United States to a whole other level”.

    “We assess that the actions of Hamas and its allies will serve as an inspiration the likes of which we haven’t seen since Isis launched its so-called caliphate years ago,” Wray said.

    Original link is paywalled: https://www.ft.com/content/e1758abc-df4c-49d4-ad4f-3f7b5f143305

  • Infamousblt [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    Is “American Security” going to pay off my student loan debts? How about my rent? How about for my medication this month?

    No?

    Then fuck off.

  • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    Ukraine? 100%. This is the best and most cost effective use of US military funding perhaps ever. A hostile (or at least deeply antagonistic) nuclear power is geopolitically neutering themselves in slow motion, and all we have to do is send some crap over and make sure the Ukrainians don’t run out of bullets. We’re destroying the combat effectiveness of what we thought was a peer power for literal pennies on the dollar.

    Israel? 😬 the whole thing is a shitshow, and Netanyahu’s strategies have been and continue to be obviously unworkable in the long term.

  • Melkath@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    8 months ago

    Why is this moron still lumping Ukraine and Israel into the same bucket?

    He should have just stuck to his most effective presidential policy, wearing cool glasses and having prog-fascists give him cool nicknames.

  • 𝔼𝕩𝕦𝕤𝕚𝕒@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    8 months ago

    I’d never seen this memorial before, so had to Google lens it and realized what the “counterargument” image was.

    It’s the memorial at the twin towers after 9/11.

    • davel [he/him]@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      8 months ago

      9/11 was blowback from what our government did in our name in the decades prior. The military-industrial complex is protecting neither our liberty nor our security; it’s making line go up for American oligarchs 📈

      • 𝔼𝕩𝕦𝕤𝕚𝕒@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        No I tracked what the whole thing was after I realized what I was looking at. Osama bin Laden and the Mujahideen and the CIA and so on, i just had a moment where brain no work so goodly because I didn’t know i was looking at the twin towers memorial.

        “Squares? Military buildings? No…it looks like a memorial. Hmm maybe vietnam? No…eh I’ll just ask google. Oh wow I feel dumb as shit”

    • MustrumR@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      There’s a slight difference between:

      • Helping an underdog that got invaded. While the invading force is by the way one of your worst enemies that the sent gear was prepared for anyway.
      • Further financing of a state that already has full capabilities to wipe the floor with a largely irrevelant country.