• Nightwingdragon@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    101
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Well, this should be no surprise.

    She’s been bending over backwards for Trump since day one, and she’s spent this entire time dragging her feet on even the most basic of issues. She created delay after delay, and is now using the delay she created as the justification for granting the postponement that Trump has been seeking all along.

    “Mid November.” What a god damned coincidence. The rotting corpse of Hellen Keller could have seen right through that load of bullshit.

    • Fredselfish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      11 months ago

      Is there anyway they can throw her out or do something about this cunts corruption? Seriously we going allow her to keep this from proceeding until she is sure he is President and can pardon himself.

        • ddh@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          It’s such an open and shut case, he may still be convicted with all the help in the world. If that happens he is in a bad position to effectively argue that she was biased against him.

          • Empricorn@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            That “may” is doing a lot of heavy-lifting. I don’t want revenge" or to punish Trump because I don’t like him (though I don’t). I want justice to be served. The judge is clearly biased toward him, and that could result in a miscarriage of justice. She must be removed.

    • CapgrasDelusion@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      At this point I’m convinced she’s literally in communication with his team or people once removed. This is the most slam dunk case ever. Did he have these documents? Yes. Was he allowed to? No.

    • Zerlyna@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      80
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      I like how they say it needs to be delayed because he’s campaigning. Fuck that. Crimes come first.

      • RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        35
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yeah, sorry I won’t be able to pay that speeding ticket right now, I’m campaigning.

        Oh, when will I be done? I suppose when the Galactic Council finally holds the vote to appoint me Supreme Galactic Overlord. Until then!

      • ristoril_zip@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        My guess is she’ll grant a delay but won’t cite his campaigning because she knows that won’t fly with appellate judges.

        She’ll have enough other bullshit justifications to give Trump what he wants and get her kickback.

        • Nightwingdragon@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          11 months ago

          My understanding is that scheduling delays are not appealable, at least not by the prosecution. Judges have the right to set their own schedules.

          She just doesn’t want to look blatantly corrupt if and when anything does go to appeal though. She’s doing her best to postpone this trial indefinitely while still maintaining something resembling plausible impartiality. I’m sure that when “Mid November 2024” comes around, she’ll suddenly have another reason to delay because Trump will then be appealing the results of the election about 47 times, and heaven forbid her case interfere with that and after all that he’s gonna need more time to prepare. So, January 2026 then? What? He’ll be too old and suffering from dementia and therefore isn’t competent to stand trial, even though he still appears on TV every day? Darn. I guess she’ll just have to postpone this trial indefinitely. It’s too bad…the people deserved to hear the truth, but whatever was she to do? The situation was completely unavoidable!!!

          • CapgrasDelusion@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            I’m sure that when “Mid November 2024” comes around, she’ll suddenly have another reason to delay because Trump will then be appealing the results of the election about 47 times

            Hopefully he’ll be in a Georgia prison by then. He can’t pardon his way out of that one either.

  • athos77@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    the Trump team asking Cannon to postpone the trial “until at least mid-November 2024.”

    How terribly convenient …

    about a month ago, Trump’s team wanted thousands of pages of evidence it already had from the investigation given to them again, so that they could see where copies of classified documents in a box stored at Mar-a-Lago may have existed among other documents, to “ascertain where the pages had been stored,” prosecutors said.

    It’s not up to the prosecutors to make up for Trump’s lawyers’ lack of organization.

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      It’s rank bullshit, yes.

      This is the same judge that allowed a special master, and that was reversed by the 3 judge appeals panel with scathing commentary.

      Her head is so far up trump’s ass the hamberders taste mostly fresh.

  • spaceghoti@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    11 months ago

    Has there been a more incompetent, political judge to ever sit on the bench? I can’t imagine how.

  • Uniquitous@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    This corrupt idiot has no business being a judge. But whatever, she’s a sideshow. He’s fucked in NY and GA. If she wants to make her name synonymous with “bought and paid for stooge” in a vain attempt to shield the orange idiot from the consequences of his own actions, let her.

  • zeppo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    11 months ago

    Of course she did. We knew as soon as this judge was assigned the case that she was going to try to wreck it, like she did the last one.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    The federal judge overseeing Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago document-mishandling case cast doubt on the viability having a trial in May 2024, signaling she may postpone the criminal proceedings.

    Cannon told Justice Department prosecutor Jay Bratt, who asked to keep the trial schedule as is: “I’m not seeing in your position a level of understanding to these realities.”

    “After four months of delay, we were allowed to review for the first time documents that are critical to some of the serious felony charges” that special counsel Jack Smith has filed, Trump’s lawyers wrote to the court two weeks ago.

    The classified records indictment has loomed over Trump’s candidacy particularly because of the questions it’s raised – with substantial known witnesses and even audio evidence – about how casually Trump treated national security information that could damage the United States if accessed at his club and about his unwillingness after his presidency to comply with regulations around presidential records.

    In a filing last week, prosecutors told the judge Trump’s team has cried wolf about their access to evidence in the case, including classified records.

    Trump’s legal team has been reviewing and discussing classified evidence in Miami, most recently on Tuesday, when the former president joined his lawyers in the SCIF during the afternoon, according to a source familiar with the matter.


    The original article contains 577 words, the summary contains 208 words. Saved 64%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!