• LadyLikesSpiders@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    1 year ago

    This subject keeps popping up, and I think the part that’s really upsetting me besides the whole “I bought this, Capcom, let me do with it what I want” is the idea that you can have a game where the solution to your problems is blowing someone’s head off with a shotgun, but god forbid Chun Li have exposed tits

    I’m not here saying that Capcom should just stop putting violence in its games, or that it should just sexualize all of its games. What I AM saying is that the idea that sexuality is inherently more offensive than killing is straight up backwards to me. It’s not even a capcom thing. That’s just most societies, but Capcom is hitting a nerve with this

    • Zion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      What I AM saying is that the idea that sexuality is inherently more offensive than killing is straight up backwards to me. It’s not even a capcom thing. That’s just most societies, but Capcom is hitting a nerve with this

      Exactly, it’s ludicrous and always was. Especially in this day and age.

      • Mom/Dad: Billy what are you watching?
      • Billy: The Texas chainsaw massacre.
      • Mom/Dad: What happens in that?
      • Billy: People get hacked up with a chainsaw.
      • Mom/Dad: Oh, ok.

      Later that day:

      • Mom/Dad: Billy what are you doing?
      • Billy: I’m playing Street fighter.
      • Mom/Dad: What’s that?
      • Billy: It’s a one on one fighting game.
      • Mom/Dad: Oh, that’s nice… Wait a minute, IS THAT A PAIR OF BREASTS BILLY!!!
      • Billy: yeah, I installed this mod and…
      • Mom/Dad: THAT’S IT! (Proceeds to confiscate the console)

      As a parent myself, I understand not wanting to expose your kid to sexual content depending on their age, but in the context of sexual intercourse etc, not just a naked body.

      • Cybersteel@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think the big difference is while violence is an expected part of life from wars and fights, sexual content is not.

        • 9bananas@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          sexual content

          not an expected part of life

          say that again, but very slowly…

          alternatively I’d be thrilled to hear all about these alternative ways to have kids that you apparently think are out there…and then I’d like it explained to me how exactly that’s not an “expected part of life”??

    • Touching_Grass@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I remember hitting a point when I realized how insane it is the most media will solve all problems with guns. Like it makes more sense why the culture cherishes guns after becoming aware how weird it is.

  • Coasting0942@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Although I don’t understand the appeal of Leon in a g-string, I also understand that Capcom didn’t make the mod.

    Heads up capcom, the religious conservatives of the world are angry that kids are playing games and not praying. Your reputation is already in the sewers.

    • Chariotwheel@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      This might be an issue, however:

      In a separate slide that’s explained a little more fully, the company adds that the impact of mods on their reputation isn’t just the result of someone stripping Leon Kennedy down to his knickers. Players who install mods only to suffer performance problems such as crashes, freezing or save data corruption can end up turning to Capcom for support, which can then eat up workload and development budget that might otherwise be spent on creating higher-quality games.

      • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ve worked in software support for a decade and saying “We can’t support you because you modified this” is pretty standard. And with automated replies they don’t take too much support time.

        • QuinceDaPence@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          You could even automate that entire process.

          Require customers to email support, require a log file, have your log files show if mods are installed, auto reply that the customer should reinstall the game without mods and see if the issue persists.

          • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            If you want to get really snarky, figure out who wrote the mods and cc them on the reply saying “For your convenience we have included the authors of the installed mods on this email so you can work with them to resolve your issue.”

      • LadyLikesSpiders@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Then just impliment some automatic message before anyone in support is contacted. Something like “If you installed mods in your game, the first step is to uninstall them. If it still works, reinstall the game. If it’s still not working after that, THEN we’ll help”

        Maybe worded a little more professionally, but just an automatic trouble-shooting message that’s gonna be every support person’s first response anyway

        • SgtAStrawberry@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          The Sims 4 have a support message like that. I have no idea how much it helps but God knows it is desperately needed.

        • SgtAStrawberry@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Look at the Sims 4 support website, is a good start to see that a lot of people will 100% ask questions like, " Completely moded action, has a bug. How to fix it? I don’t play with any mods I promise."

          So personally I don’t have any higher hopes for the Capcom audience, but credit to EA at least they just shrug their shoulders and answer " First completely remove your mods, clean the cache files and repair the game"

  • Noxy@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    then why did they make so many of the monster hunter monsters so outrageousky attractive?

  • kingthrillgore@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Didn’t you give Cammy a huge dumpy for a reason?

    You can’t do anything about it, so owe up to it and offer an SDK and Workshop support where you can at least curate the experience and steer it in the right direction.

  • Monkeyhog@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    Honestly, if it isn’t “offensive to public order and morals” I’m not that interested.

  • Kaldo@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Oh no, are we gonna see corporations go after mods now, under the guise of morality and public decency? Fuck offffff

  • val@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t think I’ve seen any public backlash hitting the developer or publisher for the content of a mod being “offensive to public order and morals” since the hot coffee stuff, and that was only because it was content already in the game. This is almost certainly a lie and the real reason is they’re worried mods will compete with things they’re selling.

      • val@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It was literally the reference point I used in my post for the last time I’ve seen any real backlash, in the first sentence.

  • beefcat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    it’s funny how this was a pretty long and nuanced discussion about modding, but social media is brewing a shitstorm over this one cherry-picked statement.

  • rockerface 🇺🇦@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Is this the same Capcom that published Devil May Cry games? I’m not sure they need modding to be offending public order and morals

  • TWeaK@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    More like they’re worried that mods will outshine them and tarnish their reputation as developers.