• pudcollar [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Communism is psilocybin. It grows from humble places. It brings out hard truths through intense dialogue and self-examination. It gives the ability to see patterns in things.

  • HornyOnMain@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    1 year ago

    de-electrochemistry - You heard the man! Get as much of that communism meth in you as fast as possible, tonight you’re going to have the mother of all highs… And you’re going to do it with COMMUNISM!

  • aaaaaaadjsf [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Nevertheless, another reading can be made of Marx. The often cited phrase–“religion is the opium of the people”–is truncated. What follows this remark lets it be understood that human beings need opium, because they are metaphysical animals who cannot avoid asking themselves questions about the meaning of life. They give what answers they can, either adopting those offered by religion or inventing new ones, or else they avoid worrying about them.

    You know, he could have bothered to actually read Marx before saying dumb shit.

    The full quote from Marx, in context, is:

    Religious suffering is, at one and the same time, the expression of real suffering and a protest against real suffering. Religion is the sigh of the oppressed creature, the heart of a heartless world, and the soul of soulless conditions. It is the opium of the people.

    The abolition of religion as the illusory happiness of the people is the demand for their real happiness. To call on them to give up their illusions about their condition is to call on them to give up a condition that requires illusions.

    • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      1 year ago

      Also what comes immediately before:

      For Germany, the criticism of religion has been essentially completed, and the criticism of religion is the prerequisite of all criticism.

      The profane existence of error is compromised as soon as its heavenly oratio pro aris et focis [“speech for the altars and hearths,” i.e., for God and country] has been refuted. Man, who has found only the reflection of himself in the fantastic reality of heaven, where he sought a superman, will no longer feel disposed to find the mere appearance of himself, the non-man [Unmensch], where he seeks and must seek his true reality.

      The foundation of irreligious criticism is: Man makes religion, religion does not make man. Religion is, indeed, the self-consciousness and self-esteem of man who has either not yet won through to himself, or has already lost himself again. But man is no abstract being squatting outside the world. Man is the world of man – state, society. This state and this society produce religion, which is an inverted consciousness of the world, because they are an inverted world. Religion is the general theory of this world, its encyclopaedic compendium, its logic in popular form, its spiritual point d’honneur, its enthusiasm, its moral sanction, its solemn complement, and its universal basis of consolation and justification. It is the fantastic realization of the human essence since the human essence has not acquired any true reality. The struggle against religion is, therefore, indirectly the struggle against that world whose spiritual aroma is religion.

      • aaaaaaadjsf [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Man is the world of man – state, society. This state and this society produce religion, which is an inverted consciousness of the world, because they are an inverted world.

        You see Peterson cannot elaborate on this because he’s a religious person who hates modernity, so this short circuits his entire belief system and ideology.

    • barrbaric [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why bother reading when your hordes of impressionable twitter followers aren’t going to read either? He gets paid either way.

  • sloth [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    1 year ago

    A psychiatrist I know once told me, “Meth-Amphetamine would help most people; the problem is, it helps too much and is easily abused.”

  • Helmic [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 year ago

    isn’t like half his philosphy that he’s a christian? what does this MEAN peterson? are you saying religion is bad but communism is worse? are you saying religion is good because opium is good? is religion harm reduction? are chrsitian socialists junkies? tell me your secrets, benzo man.

  • darth_tiktaalik@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Actually religion slots well into the meth role.

    It makes people paranoid of things that aren’t really there too.