Mullvad will removed port forwarding from their app.

      • TauZero
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Question: if port forwarding is removed, wouldn’t I2P connectivity be degraded in exactly the same way as using a torrent client? As in you can build outgoing tunnels to peers who do have a public ip/accessible port, but cannot receive incoming tunnels, same as in the table by @blank_dvth below? Making connections slower or impossible? Or is it better because of the multiple hops in a tunnel, such that two peers behind NAT can still reach each other as long as they can both find an intermediate relay node with a public ip?

    • NullRiver@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’ve been eyeing cryptostorm, uses wireguard, you can portforward, and you can do it all from a command line…

    • nullishcat@lemmy.fmhy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’m using AirVPN right now. They’re pretty good (albeit very old-school), support port forwarding, etc. Same price as Mullvad at 3 months and cheaper for any larger plans (+ they’re doing a sale right now.) Also tried IVPN - they’re OK but a little more expensive and has no port forwarding in the US.

    • cheems@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I think I’m going to ivpn, it seems pretty solid. Otherwise I’d go to airvpn