I believe more and more people will escape to lemmy sooner or later, and I already see 3 different communities for the same thing (selfhosted) here on lemmy. Time will tell which one will be the most active, but lets assume all of them will be equally active and the desire emerges to combine the two communities about the same thing, is that something possible or intended to be possible with federated services?

  • SafetyGoggles@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think this is currently one of the biggest problem of Lemmy on the UX department. Non technical users from Reddit will only expect one “subreddit” for a theme, but if they search on Lemmy, they’ll find more than one community with the same topic, and it’ll confuse them and make them less likely to come back.

    But that’s the way how Fediverse work, so I don’t think combining two communities should be done from the Fediverse side, but rather each Lemmy instance can curate a “playlist” or “multireddit” that has some of the biggest communities from the users’ server and other federated servers about the same topic, and users can subscribe to the “playlist” rather than individual community.

    • DudePluto@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      Eh, reddit really isn’t much better in this department. It’s not uncommon for multiple subs to exist for the same userbase (r/memes vs r/dankmemes, r/christian vs r/truechristian). Over time users figure out which is which, which is the main one, and which is for them

      • SafetyGoggles@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        True, but they are all with different names, and they are not completely the same (as in different rules, more specific topic vs general topic, etc). But on Lemmy there is a possibility that two communities having the same exact topic and name for example !technology@beehaw.org and !technology@lemmy.ml, they are both discussing technology (and not any specific difference between them).

        • Ada@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          1 year ago

          @SafetyGoggles The difference between those two is the moderation policies of the instance. Beehaw doesn’t federate with the same instances that lemmy.ml does, and has an explicitly more inclusive and less generalist approach. They both cover the same ground, but you couldn’t just merge them.

          Having said that, it would be nice to see a user level feature that lets end users combine communities in to one “virtual” community in their interface.

          @g7s @DudePluto

          • wesley_cook@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            The down side of that would probably be duplicated content. Like if some major news happens for a topic reposts can already be really annoying and usually need moderator action to combine threads. Then there’d be that times however many communities exist for that same topic.

            • CHOPSTEEQ@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              1 year ago

              As another pointed out, that already happens. It’s even preferable, to some. For example, I had a programming multi reddit with JavaScript and several more focused JS related subs in it. Seeing the same link or topic in multiple subs often let me get more viewpoints to consider. Outside of the web, journalism outfits all publish Associated Press articles. If you follow multiple news outlets you’ll see the same story that way as well.

              To me, it’s just natural.

            • EnronHubbard@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              We deal with that in Reddit too though. I see your point but if people are subscribing based on user count then eventually the best community will win I guess?

          • SafetyGoggles@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yep, that’s exactly what I mean. Coverung the same ground, but they are different communities with different moderation, so it can’t be merged, but it make sense to group them together and view it as a “playlist”. Just like Whitney Houston and ABBA don’t collaborate to make albums, but it make sense for their songs to exist together in a playlist called “Songs from the 80s”.

    • g7s@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      The “multireddit” aspect also makes sense to me. Thank you for elaborating an alternative approach to what I had in mind. I don’t know if such a feature is yet implemented, but for the time being, one could just subscribe to all the communities and it will be fine.

      • blob42@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        What would be nice is to have a system of tags or keywords that can be defined for a community. It would be trivial then to build a sort of multireddit where multiple communities can be aggregated by the tags they belong to.

        • Ada@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          @blob42 kbin has the ability to aggregate content in to a community by hashtag (in a distinct tab) and it’s incredibly useful. I think lemmy could really benefit from something similar

          @g7s @SafetyGoggles

          • blob42@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Thanks I didn’t know kbin before. With the recent influx of users it’s only a matter of time until these features are built.