• Pulptastic@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    That men were the hunters and drove humans to intelligence is the biggest bullshit I’ve heard all year. With the plethora of evidence of female hunters, I reject the premise of this article.

    On the other side of the coin, the thoughts on women’s endurance ability is super cool and jives with crazy long race results like RAAM.

    • healthetank@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Women are definitely capable of doing super endurance events, but they are not the equivalent of men on setting records for any race I’ve found.

      One called “backyard ultra”. Basically you do a lap of 6.7km each hour until everyone else drops out. World records are all men by a long shot - https://backyardultra.com/world-rankings/

      Fastpacking, a slower event than the backyard ultras, involve hiking/jogging through hiking trails while carrying what you need. Definitely slower pace, and I’d argue closer to what I’d imagine with a long, days-long hunt would be like for ancient tribes. FKT, or fastest known times, are often found at this website. Looking at all the times, men carry a significant lead in both supported (ie someone else carries your food/water/sleeping gear), and unsupported. As an example, look at the Appalachian Trail – https://fastestknowntime.com/route/appalachian-trail

      Even the RAAM shows solo male records much faster than women: https://www.raamrace.org/records-awards

      The thing the article failed to mention (and the thing I think is key) is that women excel at doing these things, typically, with less energy burnt both during and after the races. Women on the whole are smaller, and tend to have better insulin responses (as mentioned in the article) which means their blood sugar stays consistent during exercise and after. Consistent blood sugar means less wasted energy. Larger heart and lungs, combined with higher type 2 muscle fibres compared to women’s type 1 means, again, less wasted energy and more efficiencies. Less muscle damage, as mentioned in the diagram, means less to repair, which means more saved energy. In a hunter/gather society, this saved energy can be significant.

      With modern access to food, that evolutionary advantage seems to vanish, and the article doesn’t even touch on it.

      • Pulptastic@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        Two of the last three RAAM winners were women. Records are one thing, but women are still able to win the race even with lower % participation in the sport.