• Egon [they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    “Urban theorist” is an even more useless title than urban planner lmao. At least urban planners want to do good, they’re just ignored until they rubber-stamp pre-planmed prestige projects by the government.
    There’s fuck-all to theorize, what’s good has been known for ages. The issue is not knowing what’s good, but implementing it

    • 7bicycles [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      At least urban planners want to do good

      Highly debatable and more of a case by case basis. You get a lot of them coming at it from an “engineering” standpoint and fully carbrained

      • Egon [they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        I suppose, though in my personal experience it’s more a question of having your soul crushed and giving up at some point. Most planners I’ve interacted with want to - or at least started out with wanting to - do good. It’s just incredibly difficult to do anything other than MORE ROAD or BIG EXPENSIVE OFFICE.

        • 7bicycles [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Oh I don’t even mean the broken down people, not judging by the official position or what they actually do even, I get the constraints.

          But even discounting those the field is still littered with fully car brained people entirely on board with whatever next planning crime is currently being done