• The Octonaut
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      No, there is a middle ground between “he was not just human but also divine” and “he was not in any way special”. They consider him the most perfect human that has ever lived. They make no secret of this. They bless his name every time they use it. They have rules around his image and his reputation. And they make no secret of this. If you’ve interpreted “he’s not divine” as “he’s not special”, that’s your upbringing coming through, not theirs.

      And no I don’t need a list of all the abhorrent things Muhammed and his followers have done.

      • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        Don’t they have a rule against idolizing people? How do they not consider their treatment of Muhammad as idolizing him?

        • The Octonaut
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          It’s a quite literal rule - idols and idolatry are things that have actual meaning in Abrahamic religions, and in the pagan religions that Islam supplanted at Mecca. See also the icons and iconoclastic conflict in the neighbouring Orthodox Christian tradition.

          “Wow he’s perfect” isn’t idolatry in the literal sense of an actual physical idol object mean to be physical manifestation of, or place of residence of, a deity.

          • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            Is that why they ban all pictures/depictions of Muhammad? To avoid stepping over that line of idolizing him?