Why Bother With uBlock Being Blocked In Chrome? Now Is The Best Time To Switch To Firefox::Choose the browser that best suits your privacy needs.

  • ilmagico@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    Also, Google could just more simply stop funding Firefox: Mozilla gets a lot of money from Google just to be the default search engine. Then again, maybe Firefox can switch to Bing or Duckduckgo, though I don’t know if those would pay as well as Google.

    • decisivelyhoodnoises@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      1 year ago

      Google is not funding Firefox only for the search engine being default. Google needs to keep Firefox alive because it is their sole competitor. If Firefox (Mozilla) goes down, Google can be accused for monopoly practices which is something they want to avoid.

      • ilmagico@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean, they could also argue that all the Chromium based browsers are not Chrome, and so there is competition (we know how it really is, of course, but they have good lawyers…).

        But I’m sure that’s at least part of the reason why they keep funding it.

        • decisivelyhoodnoises@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Chromium comes straight out of Google though. It is not another browser. It is the same engine. They give their engine for free and different companies use it to make their own flavors of the engine of the “Google browser”.

          They’re actually increasing the market share of their browser engine by having chromium open source.This is not competition.

          Mozilla has good lawyers too.

          • acockworkorange
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Nah they don’t. If they had, the whole IE2 debacle would have been over in a court of law.

          • ilmagico@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yes of course, but I guess they could argue that legally they don’t count as the same browser, because each company using chromium as a base for their browser is adding or changing it as they like.

            Someone could, in fact, fork Chromium and bring back support for Manifest V2 extensions, or disable whatever things Google does to block ad blockers (and in fact, I bet someone will).