• BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    79
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hell, he literally stole money from another Republican Congressman and his wife.

    You almost have to respect it.

    • SuperDuper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      53
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      For how blatant his lies and fabrications were, and how brazenly he stole and misued money, I’m honestly impressed that he got into office in the first place (who tf was running his opponent’s campaign?). Surviving 11 months after that was just standard “Republicans refusing to hold each other accountable” behavior. But man, gotta admit the guy pulled off a pretty decent con.

      • Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        53
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m honestly impressed that he got into office in the first place (who tf was running his opponent’s campaign?).

        His opponent repeatedly tried to blow the whistle at what was going on with Santos’ campaign, but was all but ignored by the media who considered it a low-level race not worth covering. I think it took about a month after the election before the media started to actually give a damn.

      • psmgx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        The GOP wants blackmail and leverage options, and only when they have the power.

        Santos’s lies were pretty clear, blatant, and he was grifting his own party. Useless as an asset, and detrimental to his own people.

      • Furedadmins@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        He is from a safe very red district so the craziest person wins the primary and then basically gets in free after that.

        • frezik@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s a blue district, though only D+2 (meaning it tends to be 2 points more towards Dems than the national average). It did vote for Bush in 2004, but is otherwise straight blue for President since 1992. Most recently went for Biden by +10 points.

          • Furedadmins@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            1 year ago

            Republicans have historically held that seat with very large majorities. Over 70% during Bush and Obama presidencies. Trump was enough to drag it down but then as soon as he was off the ballot it’s back to crazy land Republicans. I might be wrong but to me that says deep red.