dsmaster7173@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 year agoimportant rulepostlemmy.worldimagemessage-square692fedilinkarrow-up1897arrow-down11cross-posted to: 196@lemmy.world
arrow-up1896arrow-down1imageimportant rulepostlemmy.worlddsmaster7173@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 year agomessage-square692fedilinkcross-posted to: 196@lemmy.world
minus-squarePlasmaK@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up8·1 year agoundefined> he political state, and with it political authority, will disappear as a result of the coming social revolution I think the history has shown this to be false
minus-squarePlasmaK@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 year agoYes, they were both bad. Enemy of my enemy is not necessary my friend.
minus-squarePlasmaK@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 year agoSo you agree that the premise that the state would just wither away is false?
minus-squarePlasmaK@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoDefend what? Social democracy without democracy?
undefined> he political state, and with it political authority, will disappear as a result of the coming social revolution
I think the history has shown this to be false
Removed by mod
Yes, they were both bad. Enemy of my enemy is not necessary my friend.
Removed by mod
So you agree that the premise that the state would just wither away is false?
Removed by mod
Defend what? Social democracy without democracy?