• Clairvoidance@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      The name HD 189733 b is derived from the naming convention used for astronomical objects. Let’s break it down:

      • HD: HD stands for Henry Draper Catalogue, which is a stellar catalog containing information about thousands of stars. It was compiled by Annie Jump Cannon and her colleagues in the late 19th and early 20th centuries.
      • The number represents the specific star in the Henry Draper Catalogue. In this case, HD 189733 refers to the star around which the exoplanet was discovered. The number of the star has no meaning outside of that it was the 189733rd catalogued one in HD’s catalogue
      • The letter “b” is used to designate the first known planet orbiting the star. (a is for stars) If additional planets were discovered in the same system, they would be labeled with subsequent letters in alphabetical order (e.g., HD 189733 c, HD 189733 d, and so on).

      Therefore, HD 189733 b signifies the first planet discovered orbiting the star HD 189733. This naming convention allows astronomers and researchers to identify and differentiate between different planets and their host stars in a systematic manner.

      TOI 849 b is TESS Object of Interest’s 849th discovery of interest. The numbers are essentially arbitrary outside of that numbers before them have already been taken.

      • duncesplayed@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Why don’t they just give each star a UUID? It doesn’t make any less sense, and it allows them to be uniquely named without requiring a centralized registration process.

      • Eheran@lemmy.fmhy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        What if it is a 2 star system? A and b etc. is taken. HD 189733 is good the first star, then we find the second… HD189733 AA?

        • Clairvoidance@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I fucked up a little so I understand the confusion, stars are typically in capital letters, A, B, C.
          though clear distinctions are also made here. B, C, D implies a hierarchy of orbits, A is the primary gravitational pull in its system
          Aa, Ab, (etc.) is used when two (or more) stars have a common center of mass

          Real implications of this example:
          Kepler-16A and Kepler-16B have a planet that orbits both (but to be clear they do not having a common center of mass), so it is Kepler-16b, and I didn’t look it up but I assume it’s not 16ABb because there aren’t any A or B planets to differentiate it with
          Polaris Aa and Ab are orbiting around a common center of mass, and Polaris B orbits them from further away
          Castor has 6 stars, here’s an image
          Aa and Ab are still the main center of mass in this system

          as an added bonus, black holes do not have a naming convention yet, Sagittarius A* is just in the Sagittarius A region and * is to indicate an exciting or interesting object

          and to my knowledge, it is theoretically possible for a planet to orbit an Aa star without orbiting an Ab star but I don’t think we know of any, I assume it would be named like Aa b

          • Eheran@lemmy.fmhy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            When you say common center of mass, so you mean the as in something like… Once it is outside of the object? Otherwise I assume everything has a common center of mass with everything.

            Thanks for the info!

            • Clairvoidance@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Common center of mass means they spin around each other, currently the moon orbits earth, but long long in the future, even though the moon is smaller, it will have waned the pull of the earth to an extent where you both go around in the same circle, this happens quicker with objects the more equal in size they are

    • e-ratic@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      There are an estimated 400 billion stars in the milky way galaxy and an estimated 2 trillion galaxies in the observable universe. It would not be reasonable or even possible to give every star a unique alphabetical name even for all the known languages in history.