Huge losses from national disasters prompt industry to jack up prices and pull back from some markets; ‘worst possible scenario’ for consumers

After Allstate suffered billions of dollars in losses and failed to get the rate increases it wanted, it resorted to the nuclear option. 

The insurance giant threatened last fall to stop renewing auto insurance for customers in three states that hadn’t given in to its demands, which would have left those policyholders scrambling for coverage. The states blinked.

In December, New Jersey approved auto rate increases for Allstate averaging 17%, and New York, a 15% hike. Regulators in California are allowing Allstate to boost auto rates by 30%, but still haven’t decided on its request for a 40% increase in home-insurance rates after the insurer refused to write new policies.

For many Americans, getting insurance for both their cars and homes has gone from a routine, generally manageable expense to a do-or-die ordeal that can strain household budgets.

Non-paywall link

  • dan1101@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    And the states regulate the hell out of insurance anyway, might as well just provide it at no profit if you’re making all the rules.

    • snooggums@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      Or provide it at not profit because insurance decisions should not be driven by profit motivations.

      • BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        They still have to be driven by basic math. You slim the margins a bit by not needing to generate profit, but the situation hasn’t fundamentally changed.