People across the fediverse keep referring to wolfballs as the right wing instance.

I love all our right wing members but that has never been the case.

If you have not seen my Frog in the well video I think that explains our stance pretty well.

Did Jesus refuse to eat with the tax collectors? No, wolfballs does not turn people away because their “politics” are dirty.

Nor do I attempt to cull the post to fit a certain narrative.

Shit post however you want. Say what you mean, mean what you say.

  • Masterofballs@wolfballs.comOPM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 years ago

    community edited wiki’s are good for lots of information not accurate information. multiple personal works examined in context is better for accuracy.

    • iamtanmay@wolfballs.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 years ago

      Yes, I have found articles with large number of editors, both right and left to be very unbiased and objective. But most controversial ones, lets say Rittenhouse, get a majority of left wing activists, and the spin is mad.

      This is Corporate money corrupting journalism basically.

      Even if a completely new platform was created, it would eventually be corrupt the same way.

      Other than getting a lot of conservatives to pump money into hiring good editors - which is really hard, since conservatives generally don’t spend money for such causes, do you have any ideas ?