Some people are active in their own political communities without needing the likes of their online meme communities and other peripheral interests being flooded by political discussion from Americans.

An important step towards reducing America’s tremendous influence around the world is to divest ourself from participation in their political sphere at a cultural and national level.

We don’t need to constantly validate Americans that their country is the political centre of the entire world. That’s part of the problem.

But Windows is unique in that it can fit a whole lot of shit in it. Way more than one could imagine.

Minecraft, Chrome etc are a 7 litre compost caddy of shit. Windows is a vast open country waiting to be turned into landfill of human waste.

I’ve always wondered this. For now I’ve settled on the hypothesis that all the first astronomers all had astigmatism.

Damn, that’s a lot of luck.

Off to IKEA with me then.

Interesting given that he is actually preparing for an apocalypse scenario where he hides out in a bunker only to emerge a leader of men.

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/01/30/doomsday-prep-for-the-super-rich

Yes, but the masterminds behind levelling Gaza are still at large.

Not many people could get a bullseye with 40,000 darts and a year to use them. Fairplay to Israel for their precision on this one.

It’s called a community. If Reddit doesn’t seem like this anymore, it’s because half those people are actually AI.

You’d think it would be a blow to Bethesda that their sole programmer quit, but fortunately the creation engine is so cutting edge that I’m sure they’ll lean on it just as it is for years to come.

The only reason we’re not hitting them is because people like him hold all the sway.

That’s a pretty neat way to encapsulate that concept.

That’s true but as long as his political opponent has a more supportive stance on Israel, the Democratic Party knows that there’s a lot more room to support Israel without haemorrhaging too many voters who don’t align with that value.

You’re talking as if political donors and lobbies don’t exist.

Pretty much just that Arch Linux will be more secure, stable and reliable.

Yeah so what’s your problem with what he said then?

It’s not like this was a case that was brought before him. He didn’t have to decide anything.

Just like you didn’t have to decide to be a condescending prick when people started disagreeing with you.

He’s simply disputing the assertion that ugly people aren’t allowed to make music.

That’s just not true. I imagine a lot of the kickback is coming from those of us who grew up playing those games, because when done right, there was a deeper sense of exploration and a more active role in decision making.

Saying ‘fellow men’ is the real cringe.

Besides, they’re posting on a public form, that sorta invites discussion, no?